Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The WHO pandemic agreement—securing Africa’s leadership in a fragmenting global order

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21881137
AutoresNelson Aghogho Evaborhene (0000-0001-7712-6363, Roskilde University), Jessica Oga (African Forum for Agricultural Advisory Services), Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi (0000-0002-2381-0984, Global Health Focus, Abuja, Nigeria), Echezona Ejike Udokanma (0000-0002-5597-9709, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University), Newton Runyowa (Independent Researcher, Gaborone, Botswana), Zacharia Kafuko (Director of 1Day Africa, Vaccine Equity Advocate, African Chapter of 1Day Sooner, 1DAYAFRICA, Lusaka, Zambia), Shashika Bandara (0000-0002-1698-138X, McGill University Health Centre), Chizaram Onyeaghala (0000-0002-8319-1927, Internal Medicine, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria), Chizaram Anselm Onyeaghala (University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital)
Ano2026
Volume11
Fascículo2
Páginase020634
Data de publicação2026-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
EditoraBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020634
PMID41748273
OpenAlexW7131664118
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas24

In May 2025, the World Health Assembly adopted the historic WHO Pandemic Agreement, aimed at strengthening global pandemic preparedness and equity. This legally binding treaty emerged from years of negotiation shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic’s stark inequities—particularly those experienced by African nations. While the treaty introduces important innovations, notably the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing system, significant challenges remain. Ambiguities in equity commitments, geopolitical fragmentation and rising nationalism threaten effective implementation. For Africa, realising the treaty’s promise requires robust legal frameworks, enhanced manufacturing and regulatory capacities and sustainable financing mechanisms that reduce donor dependency. This analysis critically examines the treaty’s provisions and political economy, emphasising the need for enforceable obligations, continental leadership and multi-sectoral accountability. We propose the establishment of a Pandemic Peer Review Mechanism to embed political accountability at national and regional levels. Only through coordinated African leadership, institutional investment and global solidarity can the Pandemic Agreement deliver equitable health outcomes in a fracturing global order

Accountability · Geopolitics · Global health · Negotiation · Pandemic · Politics · Solidarity · Treaty · Global Health and Surgery · Global Security and Public Health · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research

  • Overriding drug and medical technology patents for pandemic recovery

    Open Access•Katrina Perehudoff, Ellen ‘t Hoen et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • The WHO pandemic treaty

    Open Access•Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene, Jessica Oga et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • Caught between violence

    Open Access•Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene, Jessica Oga et al.•BMJ Global Health•2024

  • The Pandemic Treaty, the Pandemic Fund, and the Global Commons

    Open Access•Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene, Echezona Ejike Udokanma et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • Analysis of results from the Joint External Evaluation

    Open Access•Vin Gupta, John D Kraemer et al.•Journal of Global Health•2018

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae