Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using an adaptive, codesign approach to strengthen clinic-level immunisation services in Khayelitsha, Western Cape Province, South Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID21881538
AuthorsAndrea Timothy (0000-0003-3190-4443, Australian National University, corresponding author), David Coetzee (0000-0003-1231-6785, University of Cape Town), Chris Morgan (0000-0003-0931-5474, The University of Melbourne), Margaret Kelaher (0000-0002-9899-858X, The University of Melbourne), Ross Bailie (0000-0001-5966-3368, The University of Sydney), Margie Danchin (0000-0002-7624-5691, Royal Children's Hospital)
Year2021
Volume6
Issue3
Pagese004004
Publication date2021-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004004
PMID33762251
OpenAlexW3138623445
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

INTRODUCTION: Optimal immunisation programme service delivery and childhood vaccine coverage remains an ongoing challenge in South Africa. Previous health systems approaches have made recommendations on how to address identified barriers but detailed local implementation studies are lacking. This study aimed to improve immunisation service delivery in children under 24 months in Khayelitsha, Western Cape Province using an adaptive, co-design approach to assess and improve childhood immunisation service delivery at the clinic level. METHODS: A rapid, adaptive approach to identification of barriers and assessment of current childhood immunisation service delivery was developed with three clinics in Khayelitsha, Western Cape Province. This informed a short co-design process with key stakeholders and service providers to develop local interventions targeted at high priority barriers. Interventions were implemented for 4-6 months and evaluated using theory-based evaluation tools. Clinic service delivery, satisfaction and changes to clinic processes and parent engagement and knowledge were measured. RESULTS: Interventions developed included weekly community immunisation education radio sessions, daily clinic health talks, immunisation education and promotion materials and service provider and parent quality checklists. Evaluation post-intervention showed improvement in parents'/guardians' knowledge about immunisation, parent engagement and service provider commitment to improvement in service quality. Radio sessions and immunisation education and communication materials were deemed most useful by parents and providers. CONCLUSION: Immunisation service delivery can be strengthened using an adaptive, clinic-led assessment process which can effectively identify barriers, inform co-designed interventions and be evaluated over a short period. This approach provides a framework to guide future local participatory action research to more effectively improve childhood immunisation service delivery and other child health services in under-resourced settings

Business · Family medicine · Health promotion · Psychological intervention · Public health · Service delivery framework · Service provider · Bacterial Infections and Vaccines · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Nursing · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Marketing

  • Tailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context

    Open Access•Alba Luna McGirr, Meredith Center et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • A feasibility assessment of a traumatic brain injury predictive modelling tool at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center and Duke University Hospital

    Open Access•Paige O’Leary, Alexis Domeracki et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • “Must you make an app?” A qualitative exploration of socio-technical challenges and opportunities for designing digital maternal and child health solutions in Soweto, South Africa

    Open Access•Sonja Klingberg, Molebogeng Motlhatlhedi et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2022

  • SQUIRE 2.0 ( Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)

    Open Access•Greg Ogrinc, Louise Davies et al.•BMJ Quality & Safety•2016

  • Measuring vaccine hesitancy

    Open Access•Heidi J Larson, Caitlin Jarrett et al.•Vaccine•2015

  • Achieving Research Impact Through Co‐creation in Community‐Based Health Services

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Claire Jackson et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2016

  • The role of insurance in the achievement of universal coverage within a developing country context

    Open Access•Alex M van den Heever•BMC Public Health•2012

  • Community-led trials

    Open Access•Neil Andersson•BMC Public Health•2017

  • Health provider responsiveness to social accountability initiatives in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Elsbet Lodenstein, Marjolein Dieleman et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    John W Creswell, Vicki L Plano Clark•Designing and Conducting Mixed…•2017

  • Balancing Opposing Forces-A Nested Process Evaluation Study Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Designed Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of an Experience Based Codesign Intervention

    Open Access•Victoria Jane Palmer, Donella Piper et al.•International Journal of…•2016

  • Understanding the benefits and challenges of community engagement in the development of community mental health services for common mental disorders

    Open Access•Inge Petersen, Kim Baillie et al.•Transcultural Psychiatry•2012

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae