Theoretical conceptualisations of problematic exercise in psychometric assessment instruments
A systematic review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21882298 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alvaro Sicilia (0000-0001-9436-8743, University of Almería), Adrián Paterna (0000-0002-7561-9487, University of Almería), Manuel Alcaraz‐ibáñez (0000-0002-1297-9565, University of Almería), M A Griffiths (0000-0003-3070-1804, Nottingham Trent University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 4-20 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Addictions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2062-5871 • E-ISSN: 2063-5303 |
| Publisher | Akademiai Kiado Zrt. (PUBLISHER • HU) |
| DOI | 10.1556/2006.2021.00019 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 60 |
Background and aims: The aim of the present systematic review was to identify psychometric tools developed to assess problematic exercise in order to identify and compare their theoretical conceptualisations on which they are based. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases Web of Science, Scielo, PsychINFO, PsycTEST and SCOPUS from their inception to January 2020. Results: Seventeen assessment instruments met the eligibility criteria to be included in the present review. The instruments were classified according to their conceptualisation into five groups: (i) problematic exercise as an end of an exercise continuum, (ii) problematic exercise as a means of regulating body size and weight, (iii) problematic exercise as dependence, (iv) problematic exercise as a behavioural addiction and (v) no clear conceptualisation. Discussion: The results suggest that the conceptualisations of the assessment instruments have resulted in a strong dichotomy in relation to the primary or secondary character of the problematic exercise that might be limiting the capacity of the instruments to adequately capture the multidimensionality of this construct. Conclusions: Given the interest in understanding the complexity surrounding the problematic exercise, future research should develop more comprehensive definitions of this construct. This would allow a greater conceptual consensus to be reached that would allow progress to be made in the study of the problematic exercise
The Expanded Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI-3)
Does Exercise Addiction Exist Among Individuals Engaged in Team-Based Exercise? A Position Paper
Chasing a Phantom Dysfunction
Mental Disorders in Individuals With Exercise Addiction—A Cross-Sectional Study
A Review of the Components of Problematic Exercise in Psychometric Assessment Instruments
Examining the reliability of the scores of self-report instruments assessing problematic exercise
Exercise addiction
A qualitative exploration of narratives among problematic exercise experiences
Disorders due to addictive behaviors
Swedish Clinicians' Knowledge, Practices, and Access to Structured Guidance Regarding Maladaptive Exercise in Eating Disorders
Toward a Syndrome Model of Addiction
How Much is Too Much? The Development and Validation of the Exercise Dependence Scale
Toward a consensus definition of pathological video-gaming
A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Morbid exercise behaviour and eating disorders
An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM ‐5 approach
A Framework for the Specificity of Addictions
Clarifying Exercise Addiction
The Exercise Addiction Inventory
Psychometric Properties of the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale
Physical, psychosocial, menstrual changes/risks, and addiction in the female marathon and nonmarathon runner
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |