The Effect of Common Features on Brand Choice
Moderating Role of Attribute Importance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2192302 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexander Chernev (0009-0004-6500-3066, Northwestern University, corresponding author), Alex Chernev |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 304 |
| Publication date | 1997-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/209485 |
| OpenAlex | W2123603129 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
In this article, the effect of common features on brand choice and the moderating role of attribute importance are examined. It is argued that when brand attributes differ in importance, common features are likely to enhance consumer preferences for the option with the best value on the most important attribute, thus further polarizing brands' choice shares. In contrast, when attributes are similar in their importance, common features are likely to have an opposite effect, equalizing brands' shares. The data provide support for these propositions. Copyright 1997 by the University of Chicago
Advertising · Brand equity · Business · Consumer choice · Contrast (vision) · Statistics · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Marketing · Mathematics
Confirmation Bias
Does matching up features mess up job choice? Boundary conditions on attribute‐salience effects
Cancellation and Focus
From quality to quantity
Cognitive and motivational structure of sustainability
Effects of simplifying choice tasks on estimates of taste heterogeneity in stated-choice surveys
The Zero-Comparison Effect
Parity Product Features Can Enhance or Dilute Brand Evaluation
Coping with Ambivalence
The Impact of Common Features on Consumer Preferences
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2012 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |