International Investment Law, Rule of Law, and Democracy
When the Solution Is Part of the Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21971556 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christian Riffel (0000-0002-4105-7324, University of Canterbury, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 613-635 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | German Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2071-8322 • E-ISSN: 2071-8322 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/glj.2025.23 |
| OpenAlex | W4410312271 |
| Language | EN |
It has become fashionable to attack the international investment system, even for former advocates such as the United States Trade Representative. This Article demonstrates a way forward of how the system may be saved—but not the way its proponents propagate. Because of the uncertainty of an economic justification, a rule of law legitimation is mostly advanced in defense of the international investment system. However, in an investment context, even the rule of law can be too much of a good thing, namely when in conflict with democracy. The Article elaborates how best to reconcile investment protection, rule of law, and democratic government, and concludes that only a thin understanding of the rule of law is acceptable on the international plane from the vantage point of democratic theory. Following from this, the Article advocates for a re-calibration of the standard of review and identifies proportionality testing as the setting screw of choice
Democracy · Economics · Law and economics · Municipal law · Political science · Public law · Rule of law · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law · World Trade Organization Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |