Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What did Hegel, Marx, and Ilyenkov mean by “ideal”

Bibliographic Data

ID21971657
AuthorsР Р Вахитов (0000-0001-9161-0899, University of Science and Technology, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume18
Issue3
Pages57
Publication date2025-09-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFilosofskii Zhurnal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2072-0726 • E-ISSN: 2658-4883
PublisherInstitute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.21146/2072-0726-2025-18-3-57-71
OpenAlexW4416111284
LanguageEN

E.V. Ilyenkov created the doctrine of the ideal, developing the concept of Marx. Marx came from the school of Hegel, although he subjected Hegel’s philosophy to a critical re­vision. There is a terminological continuity between the teachings of Hegel, Marx and Ilyenkov. In particular, Ilyenkov uses the term “ideal” not in the generally accepted sense today, but in the narrow, specific sense in which it was used by Marx and Hegel. For Hegel, the ideal or ideality is a denial of reality that presupposes its virtual preservation. Ideality is not an unchangeable substance, it is a relationship that arises between an object and the spirit that comprehends it, revealing the inner idea of the object. So, the word “tree” ideally contains a real tree. According to Hegel, the ideal does not exist by itself, but in activity, and this activity is cognition. Marx shares the understanding of ideality as a relationship between two objects, in which one represents and expresses the essence of the other. But ideality, according to Marx, “exists” in labor activity, in material produc­tion (including such aspects of it as exchange and consumption). Thus, an item, being put on the market, is included in the system of public relations and acquires an ideal value and price. Ilyenkov follows Marx in understanding the ideal. But the Soviet philosopher created a philosophical theory of the ideal. To do this, he rethought the interpretation of philosophy. Philosophy, according to Ilyenkov, is not a “science of sciences”, but a science of thinking. And thinking is connected with material production, in which the ideal is “born”

Denial · Doctrine · Education and Professional Development · Education, Literature, Philosophy Research · Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae