Legislative Materials in the Light of Polish and Spanish Law, Judicial Practice and Theoretical Literature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21984052 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paulina Konca (0000-0003-1532-8693, University of Silesia in Katowice, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2082-3304 • E-ISSN: 2082-3304 |
| Publisher | Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.36280/afpifs.2019.1.38eng |
| OpenAlex | W3112310176 |
| Language | EN |
The purpose of the paper is to present a comparative analysis of the use of legislative materials in the process of statutory interpretation in Poland and Spain, by referring to statutes, theoretical literature and case law. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part shows that in difficult cases, when the text is not clear enough as an evidence of the legislator’s intention, other evidence should be sought, including the legislative materials. The second part delivers an analysis of the term ‘legislative materials’, followed by a study of particular examples of legislative materials, including bills and their justifications. It focuses especially on the issue of the Spanish exposiciones de motivos. Moreover, there is a reference to interpretative guidance contained in the legal regulations and to the ways in which legislative materials are used in case law. The third part of the paper responds, on the basis of Polish and Spanish theoretical literature, to some of the objections against the use of legislative materials, underlining its importance for the interpreting the law
Common law · Legislation · Legislative process · Legislator · Legislature · Political science · Statute · Statutory law · Comparative International Legal Studies · European and International Law Studies · Law · Legal processes and jurisprudence · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|