Finding Intimacy Online
A Machine Learning Analysis of Predictors of Success
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22004609 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Germano Vera Cruz (0000-0002-8297-6933, Université de Picardie Jules Verne), Elias Aboujaoude (0000-0003-1216-8313, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA), Lucien Rochat (0000-0002-9992-2720, Addiction Division, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland), Francesco Bianchi-Demichelli (Sexual Medicine Consultation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland), Yasser Khazaal (0000-0002-8549-6599, University Hospital of Lausanne) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 604-612 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2152-2715 • E-ISSN: 2152-2723 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1089/cyber.2022.0367 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 36 |
While an extensive scientific literature now exists on the use of online dating services, there are very few studies on user satisfaction with dating apps and with the resulting offline dates. This study aimed to assess the level of satisfaction with Tinder use (STU) and the level of satisfaction with Tinder offline dates (STOD) in a sample of adult users of the app. The study also aimed to examine, among 28 variables, those that are the most important in predicting STU and STOD. Overall, 1,387 Tinder users completed an online questionnaire. A machine learning model was used to rank order predictors from most to least important. On a 4-point scale, participants' mean STU score was 2.39, and, on a 5-point scale, mean STOD score was 3.05. The results indicate that satisfaction with dating apps and with resulting offline dates is strongly predicted by participants' age and by their motives for using Tinder (enhancement, emotional coping, socialization, finding “true love,” or casual sexual partners), whereas the variables negatively associated with satisfaction were those related to psychopathology. Interestingly, 65.3 percent of app users were married or “in a relationship,” and only 50.3 percent of app users were using it to meet someone offline. Generally, participants who engage with the app to cope with personal difficulties seem more likely to report higher levels of dissatisfaction, suggesting that dating apps are a poor coping mechanism and highlighting the need to address underlying problems or pathologies that may be driving their use
Disintermediating your friends
Rapid assessment of well‐being
The sexual desire inventory
Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS)
Validation of a short French version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale
Loneliness and depression in the elderly
“Sexting” and Its Relation to Sexual Activity and Sexual Risk Behavior in a National Survey of Adolescents
Dating Apps and Their Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Correlates
To Tinder or not to Tinder, that's the question
Random Forests
A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework
Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders
Swiping more, committing less
A Rejection Mind-Set
Measuring Global Self-Esteem
Association Between Social Networks and Subjective Well-Being in Adolescents
Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives
Experience of loneliness among adolescent girls and boys
The Dual Control Model
An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment
Less in-person social interaction with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness
Uses and Gratifications Research
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |