Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Different Year, Different Jurisdiction, but the Same Findings

Reforming Isn't Enough

Bibliographic Data

ID22005287
AuthorsKristen Weber (Youth Development), Bill Bettencourt (University of Houston)
Year2022
Volume12
Issue1
Publication date2022-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueColumbia Journal of Race and Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2155-2401 • E-ISSN: 2155-2401
PublisherColumbia University Libraries (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.52214/cjrl.v12i1.9930
OpenAlexW4283803180
LanguageEN
Citations received2

For the last fifteen years, the Center for the Study of Social Policy (“CSSP”) partnered with local agencies to use an Institutional Analysis (“IA”), a method that identifies how local child welfare institutions are not working for families. We have particularly focused on the experiences of Black families. Through a comprehensive and varied qualitative data analyses, each IA strives to make the invisible and detrimental workings of systems more visible, that is, each IA reveals specific institutional features that contribute to poor outcomes for Black families. Findings from IAs have identified problematic policies, practices, protocols, resource distribution, and other features at the local, regional, state, and federal levels. From the twenty IAs conducted to date, we have substantial evidence of the insidious, pervasive, and mutating structural and institutional racism ingrained in child welfare systems. While the IAs have unique findings in each jurisdiction, there are also common findings, including: lack of meaningful and reasonable efforts to keep families together; policies that undermine existing networks of Black families; lack of due process and poor advocacy for Black families; inaccessible, inappropriate, and ineffective resources offered to families; coercive and punitive interventions; hyper surveillance of Black families; workforce fear of Black families, particularly Black fathers; and ineffective mechanisms of accountability that result in blaming families for the failures of workers, providers, and larger societal ills (lack of housing, lack of livable wages, etc.). This Piece presents evidence compiled over the years which leads us to conclude that reforms within the current system will only go so far and that radical investment in community supports and anti-poverty efforts are necessary

Accountability · Criminology · Jurisdiction · Political science · Psychological intervention · Punitive damages · Sociology · Welfare · Workforce · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Psychology

  • Why we must end mandatory reporting laws

    Alan J Dettlaff•Critical and Radical Social Work•2025

  • Can Social Work Be Abolitionist

    Maya Pendleton, Alan J Dettlaff•Journal of Progressive Human…•2025

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae