Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political-Economic Roots of Coercion

Slavery, Neoliberalism, and the Racial Family Policy Logic of Child and Social Welfare

Bibliographic Data

ID22005301
AuthorsGwendoline M Alphonso (0000-0001-6451-3428, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume11
Issue3
Publication date2021-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueColumbia Journal of Race and Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2155-2401 • E-ISSN: 2155-2401
PublisherColumbia University Libraries (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.52214/cjrl.v11i3.8742
OpenAlexW3205602648
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The Article argues that at the core of the American neoliberal policy regime, of which child welfare is a critical part, lies an enduring raced family policy logic of two racially stratified standards: a punitive Black economic utility family standard and a supportive white domestic affection family standard, whose policy roots and practices trace back to slavery in the antebellum South. Historically and contemporaneously, state regulation of poor Black families has been shaped by, and in turn perpetuates, the Black economic utility standard that normalizes and places political value above all else on the promotion of labor by Black mothers outside of their homes in service of a racially-discriminatory market order. By doing so, the state devalues the affective, nurturing labor that Black mothers perform within their households and towards their children. Long followed in Southern local policy practices and led by the efforts of congressmen from the South, the Black economic utility standard is shown to have been formalized nationally within the neoliberal policy regime through a repurposing of overtly racial ideas into behavioral values of work and self-sufficiency that are enshrined in social and child welfare reforms. The Article suggests that the deployment of the Black economic utility standard by the neoliberal policy regime pathologizes poor Black women’s childbearing and motherhood as economically irresponsible, obscures centuries-long structural inequalities and racial family coercion, and serves to perpetuate and justify Black family disruptions in colorblind ways

Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law

  • Fathering in a Pandemic

    Open Access•Adaobi Anakwe, Keon L Gilbert et al.•American Journal of Men s Health•2026

  • “They don't trust me”

    Open Access•Antonio R Garcia, Rafael Perez‐figueroa et al.•Family Relations•2024

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae