Internet Use and Perceptions of Social Fairness in China
The Mediating Role of Social Trust and Urban-Rural Heterogeneity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22006265 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zheng Liu (0000-0003-2471-6225, Henan Forestry Vocational College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440251406692 |
| OpenAlex | W4417185609 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
This study, positioned at the critical juncture of China’s transition from digitalization to intelligence, explores how Internet use is associated with social trust and perceptions of social fairness, as well as how these relationships vary across different social contexts. Based on nationally representative data from the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) 2021, regression analysis and Bootstrap methods were employed to systematically examine the relationship between internet usage frequency and perceptions of social fairness as well as the mediating role of social trust. Urban-rural heterogeneity was identified as the primary source of variation through within-sample comparison, while Henan Province was examined as a validating case to test mechanism robustness. The research found that in the national sample, internet usage frequency was significantly negatively associated with perceptions of social fairness, and this relationship was partially mediated by the decrease in social trust, with the mediating effect accounting for 24% to 37% of the total effect depending on model specification. Notably, urban residents experience twice the negative impact compared to rural residents (β_urban = −.080 vs. β_rural = −.040, p n = 398) demonstrates consistent mechanism direction with the national sample, with effect sizes even larger (β = −.089) though marginally significant due to smaller sample size, validating the theoretical robustness of the identified pathways. These findings provide important implications for digital governance practice: digital inclusion policies should shift from “universality-oriented” to “quality-oriented”; mechanisms should be constructed to protect social trust in the digital era; and differentiated urban-rural digital development strategies should be implemented to promote positive interaction between digitalization and social harmony
Digital divide · European Social Survey · General Social Survey · Perception · Social trust · Survey data collection · The Internet · E-Government and Public Services · Social Capital and Networks · Social Media and Politics
Information and Expression in a Digital Age
Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction
New Technology and Digital Worlds
Bowling alone
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
The Quality of Society and Happiness
Lost and Saved . . . Again
Social media use and participation
Social Identity Theory
The Group Engagement Model
Conceptualizing digital capital
Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review
Digital Divide
Trust in Government and Media Slant
The digital divide has grown old
The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access
Navigating the maze
Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation
Social Networking Sites
Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site
Achieving resilience through smart cities? Evidence from China
Social Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy
When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority
Policy Reinvention and Diffusion
Exploring the Sources of Institutional Trust in China
Social capital, civil society and development
Digital inequalities and why they matter
"The Benefits of Facebook "Friends
Social trust and grassroots governance in rural China
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |