Learner Emotions and AI Scoring
Integrating Affective Signals in Language Evaluation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22006865 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabahattin Yeşilçınar (0000-0001-6457-0211, MUS ALPARSLAN UNIVERSITY, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440261447928 |
| OpenAlex | W7164494297 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) is reshaping language assessment practices, yet most AI-driven approaches remain limited in their ability to recognize the affective dimensions that shape learner performance. This study explores how real-time emotional and physiological signals—such as heart rate variability and facial expressions—can be integrated into AI-mediated oral assessment to enhance fairness, validity, and learner support. Using a combination of generative AI (GPT-4), OpenAI Whisper, affective computing, and IoT-enabled biofeedback, an experimental platform was developed to capture and respond to learners’ emotional states during speaking tasks. Grounded in Weir’s sociocognitive validity framework and Shneiderman’s human-centered AI principles, the study involved 24 intermediate English learners and examined the correlation between affective data and oral performance, the alignment between AI and human scoring, and learner perceptions of fairness and emotional support. Results showed that emotional states significantly impacted language output and that integrating affective input improved the alignment between AI and human ratings, particularly in fluency and coherence. Participants generally perceived the system as transparent and empathetic but raised concerns about emotional surveillance and data privacy. The findings contribute to emerging discussions on human-centered assessment design by highlighting how affective responsiveness in AI-supported assessment can foster interpretive fairness, reduce performance anxiety, and support learner agency
Affective Computing · Emotion recognition · Emotional intelligence · Facial expression · Fluency · Language acquisition · Perception · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Emotion and Mood Recognition · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Language Testing and Validation
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT
GPT-3
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence
Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores
Generative AI and the future of education
Generative AI and ChatGPT
Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education
Limitations of the Common European Framework for developing comparable examinations and tests
How do we go about investigating test fairness
Toward human-centered AI
Effectiveness of message framing in changing Covid-19 vaccination intentions
Using thematic analysis in psychology
An argument for basic emotions
| Highly cited | No |
|---|