Hybrid Work, Institutional Barriers, and South Korea’s Productivity Gap
A Sociological Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22007971 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ben Choi, Ridley Sendow, Tophy David |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 03 |
| Pages | 103-120 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology Mind (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2160-0848 • E-ISSN: 2160-083X |
| Publisher | Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4236/sm.2026.163007 |
| OpenAlex | W7166841681 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
There is a striking sociological paradox that exists in South Korea, a country that is infamous for its demanding workplace culture. Here, the economy can be described as high-income with a world-class digital infrastructure that ranks last among 40 countries in hybrid working adoption (averaging just 0.5 remote days per week), yet the country already achieves productivity above what cross-national patterns would predict, given its lack of workplace flexibility. A comparison of data from 25 countries suggests that South Korea is an outlier, with actual productivity of $53 purchasing power parity (PPP) per hour, exceeding the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) trend line prediction of $40.13 at 0.5 working from home (WFH) days per week (R2 = 0.54, N = 25). This paper argues that Korea’s position in this data set reflects an institutional lock-in where productivity is maintained through the exhaustion of embodied social capital rather than technological efficiency. Drawing on Bourdieu’s field theory, Hall and Soskice’s institutional complementarities, and Esping-Andersen’s care regime typology, we identify six interlocking barriers-Confucian hierarchy, ppalli-ppalli urgency, presenteeist evaluation, chaebol governance, the Gender Flexibility Trap, and extreme land constraints-that neutralize the gains of remote work. Additionally, this paper explores the MZ generation as a potential catalyst for field transformation. We argue that their resistance to traditional workplace norms represents a rejection of the current symbolic capital, which could shift South Korean corporate culture from loyalty-based physical presence to digital-native competency. This paper concludes that while the current system sustains a local equilibrium, South Korea is forgoing potential gains of $78 - $107 PPP/hr found in high flexibility economies. Realizing these gains requires a shift in the symbolic, institutional, and care-regime domains to support the emerging counter-culture views of the younger workforce
Economic analysis · Productivity · Sociological research · Asian Industrial and Economic Development · Employment and Welfare Studies · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Varieties of Capitalism
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies
Uneven Use of Remote Work to Prevent the Spread of Covid-19 in South Korea's Stratified Labor Market
Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment
Impact of Telework on Job Satisfaction and Work–Family Conflict
Negotiating and Contesting Confucian Workplace Culture in South Korea
Competing devotions in the postpandemic economy
Nunchi Across Cultures
The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers
Babies, Work, or Both? Highly Educated Women's Employment and Fertility in East Asia
| Highly cited | No |
|---|