Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Platform Pr – The Public Moderation of Platform Values Through Tiktok for Good

Bibliographic Data

ID22009095
AuthorsRebecca Scharlach (0000-0003-3033-5795, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author)
Year2023
Publication date2023-12-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2162-3317 • E-ISSN: 2162-3317
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13490
OpenAlexW4392406507
LanguageEN
References cited14

TikTok wants to “inspire creativity” and “spark joy,” Meta aims to “bring the world closer together,” and YouTube aspires to “give everyone a voice and show them to the world.” Platforms claim that they want to do $2 . However, they regularly get international attention for being $2 instead. Social media data scandals are a prominent point of research. Yet initiatives to counterbalance these backlashes, such as YouTube’s Black Voices Fund or TikTok for Good are rarely investigated. Although platform initiatives' content is often not on the top of your For You Page (FYP), such social initiatives can tell much about what values a platform aims to promote. Examining the values promoted through social initiatives of platform companies provides a way to understand what these companies try to center as important or worthwhile. This project investigates the promotion of platform values through “TikTok for Good,” based on an inductive and thematic analysis of TikTok for Good videos (n=180). With this study, I aim to explore how platform values can enhance our understanding of the construction of what a platform counts as $2 , what is worth being visible, and in turn, what is not

Internet privacy · Moderation · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Educational Methods and Impacts · Islamic Finance and Communication · Linguistics and Language Analysis · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Thematic analysis.

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•APA Handbook of Research Methods…•2012

  • Expanding the debate about content moderation

    Open Access•Tarleton Gillespie, Pat Aufderheide et al.•Internet Policy Review•2020

  • From content moderation to visibility moderation

    Open Access•Jing Zeng, D Bondy Valdovinos Kaye•Policy & Internet•2022

  • PositiveEnergy Douyin

    Xu Chen, D Bondy Valdovinos Kaye et al.•Chinese Journal of Communication•2021

  • Influence for social good

    Minjie Li•International Journal of…•2022

  • Twitter Presence and Experience Improve Corporate Social Responsibility Outcomes

    Open Access•Siva K Balasubramanian, Yiwei Fang et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • The value(s) of social media rituals

    Open Access•Blake Hallinan, Bumsoo Kim et al.•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Facebook futures

    Open Access•Joachim Haupt•New Media & Society•2021

  • Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook

    Open Access•Taina Bucher•New Media & Society•2012

  • The practice of parodying

    Open Access•Lillian Boxman-Shabtai•Media Culture & Society•2019

  • The Techlash and Tech Crisis Communication

    Nirit Weiss-Blatt•Techlash and Tech Crisis…•2021

  • What is platform governance

    Robert Gorwa•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Ten Proposals on Values

    Open Access•N Heinich•Cultural Sociology•2020

  • Do Not Recommend? Reduction as a Form of Content Moderation

    Open Access•Tarleton Gillespie•Social Media + Society•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae