Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Walkshops – Testing a Low Threshold Methodology for Participatory City Making

Bibliographic Data

ID22009600
AuthorsJonas Breuer (0000-0002-6276-719X), Ine Van Zeeland (0000-0002-7458-565X), Jo Pierson (0000-0002-9077-6229, IMEC)
Year2023
Publication date2023-03-29
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2162-3317 • E-ISSN: 2162-3317
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5210/spir.v2022i0.12978
OpenAlexW4365151874
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

This research is about an inclusive, participatory methodology for smart city research: walking in the ‘datafied’ city. So-called walkshops facilitate experiences of and discussion about the environment in which social challenges arise, together with urban dwellers who may perceive them in different ways than decision-makers. We are investigating if walkshops provide a low-threshold methodology for meaningful involvement of all urban dwellers in technological decision-making, with a specific interest in the involvement of societal groups that are vulnerable. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), for example, highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and control of all technology users over the processing and use of their personal data. This includes so-called vulnerable data subjects. In smart, datafied cities, personal data protection provisions and rights could contribute to empowering urban dwellers. However, taking self-determined decisions regarding legal provisions and complex technical systems is often difficult, and nigh impossible for some. Despite the legal efforts to empower all data subjects vis-à-vis the processing of their personal data, inherent power imbalances remain, and the provisions hardly reach some groups. An important aim of the walkshop methodology is therefore to be inclusive and attractive for anyone. Against this backdrop, we describe how the methodology was tested, and evaluated during eighteen walks in the cities of Brussels, Gent, and Leuven. Evaluations by researchers, participants, and partner organisations, showed very promising results despite some methodological challenges (e.g. participant recruitment). Walkshops show the potential for socially relevant empirical work that creates win-win situations for researchers, public partners, and citizenries

Accountability · Business · Citizen journalism · Internet of Things · Internet privacy · Political science · Public relations · Smart city · Computer Science · Engineering · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Law · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Smart Cities and Technologies

  • From critique to hope

    Open Access•Frank Jansen, Maxigas Maxigas et al.•Convergence The International…•2026

  • The right to the city and data protection for developing citizen-centric digital cities

    Jonas Breuer, Jo Pierson•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • The walking interview

    Open Access•James Evans, Phil Ian Jones•Applied Geography•2010

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae