Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Infrastructural Ruptures

Anxieties, Borders, and Clouds

Bibliographic Data

ID22009613
AuthorsFrank Jansen (0000-0002-1295-7788, University of Amsterdam), Fieke Jansen, Niels Ten Oever (0000-0001-5134-2199), Albert Baur (0000-0003-3245-056X), Andreas Baur, Corinne Cath (0000-0001-9652-3890), Sarah Vorndran, Maxigas, Nai Kalema
Year2026
Publication date2026-01-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2162-3317 • E-ISSN: 2162-3317
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5210/spir.v2024i0.15390
OpenAlexW7133484140
LanguageEN

The rapidly changing geopolitical landscape forces us to rethink the relation between infrastructure, politics, control, and power. This panel contributes to discussions on ruptures by exploring how digital infrastructures reconfigure the state, market, and citizen nexus and presenting research approaches that interrogate transnational networks by centring their materiality. Jointly, the papers showcase how infrastructures are used as a continuation of politics with material means. The authors present five case studies from the global north and south, which foreground the delegation and transfer of power away from states and citizens and the anxiety resulting from this. The papers frame the leveraging of infrastructures in global power relations through the lenses of bordering, infrastructural anxiety, defamiliarization, financialization, and necropolitics. Together, the papers show how the transfer of power to third parties, with their particular agendas and interests, leads to a reconfiguration of control, bringing new challenges to states and citizens. Jointly, the detailed case studies raise questions about initiatives surrounding digital sovereignty, digital public infrastructures, and global internet governance as means of citizen emancipation and their ability to serve the public interest. The panel invites engagement with the development of new infrastructural ideologies to underpin sustainable and equitable futures. The panel is timely because it shows that countries have not (yet) developed an answer to the transition from privatization and globalization to predatory neorealism, which echoes 19th-century conceptions of power that assert that 'might is right'

Corporate governance · Emancipation · Geopolitics · Globalization · Ideology · Politics · The Internet · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Global Urban Networks and Dynamics · Water Governance and Infrastructure

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae