Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Infrastructural Insecurity

Geopolitics in the Standardization of Telecommunications Networks

Bibliographic Data

ID22009779
AuthorsNiels Ten Oever (0000-0001-5134-2199, University of Amsterdam), Christoph Becker (0000-0002-8364-0593, University of Amsterdam)
Year2023
Publication date2023-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2162-3317 • E-ISSN: 2162-3317
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13502
OpenAlexW4392406552
LanguageEN
References cited7

This paper argues that the production of ‘infrastructural insecurity’ is an inherent part of the standardization of information networks. Infrastructural insecurity is the outcome of an intentional process within infrastructural production, standardization, and maintenance that leaves end-users of the infrastructure vulnerable to attacks that benefit a particular actor. We ground this analysis in an interrogation of the responses to the disclosure of three security vulnerabilities in telecommunications networks, namely (1) a security flaw in Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) that allows for the data interception and surveillance, SMS interception and location tracking by third parties, (2) the lack of encryption of permanent identifiers that allowed for the deployment of rogue base stations, which allowed for man-in-the-middle attacks, resulting in interception of all voice and data traffic in a physical signal vicinity, and (3) the lack of forward secrecy between user-equipment and the home network, which allows for the decryption of current encrypted data stream if credentials were obtained in the past. To research the shaping of communication and infrastructure architectures in the face of insecurities, we develop a novel approach to the study of Internet governance and standard-setting processes that leverages web scraping and computer-assisted document set discovery software tools combined with document analysis. We bring these methods into conversation with theoretical approaches from material media studies, science and technology studies, and critical security studies. This is an important contribution because it asks fundamental questions about the adequacy and legitimacy of standardization processes

Business · Geography · Geopolitics · Political science · Regional science · Standardization · Telecommunications · Computer Science · ICT Impact and Policies

  • Reluctant Power

    Rita Zajácz•Reluctant Power•2019

  • Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach

    Michael Veale, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius•Computer Law Review International•2021

  • Migrating Servers, Elusive Users

    Open Access•Ksenia Ermoshina, Francesca Musiani•Media and Communication•2017

  • Migrating Servers, Elusive Users

    Open Access•Ksenia Ermoshina, Francesca Musiani•Media and Communication•2018

  • Mapping the routes of the Internet for geopolitics

    Open Access•Kevin Limonier, Frédérick Douzet et al.•First Monday•2021

  • A market of black boxes

    Ksenia Ermoshina, Benjamin Loveluck et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae