“A New Language of Critical Theory”
Debord’s Style of Negation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22009881 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ben Papsun (Tufts University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-57 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SPECTRA the Social Political Ethical and Cultural Theory Archives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2162-8793 • E-ISSN: 2162-8793 |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.21061/spectra.v10i1.230 |
| OpenAlex | W4386650680 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This article examines how a negative critique operates in the work of French philosopher and avant-gardist, Guy Debord. This article also assesses the aesthetic and political effects of Debord’s negative critique. I discuss how Debord handles the difficult, if not impossible, task of formulating a mode of expression that does not fall victim to recuperation by spectacular society, and how his strategy of negation bears the weight of a stylistic tradition (with roots in the works of Hegel and Marx) which Debord works with and against. I pay particular attention to Debord’s pointed but easily overlooked critique of Roland Barthes, whose theorization of a “writing degree zero” signifies for Debord an idealized negation of style, and not the proper language of critical theory, which must be a more subversive “style of negation.” Finally, I suggest that the ultimate historical failure of Debord’s political program does not undermine its value as a critical apparatus, and that the unfinished and uncertain character of Debord’s theory is a necessary and useful aspect of his praxis, rather than an ideological defect
Aesthetics · Art · Critical theory · Epistemology · Hegelianism · Ideology · Linguistics · Literature · Negation · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Praxis · Sociology · Latin American Literature Studies · Law · Marxism and Critical Theory · Mathematics · Music History and Culture · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|