Podcasting as Alternative Media

Navigating Politics, Platform Power, and Journalistic Professionalism in China

Bibliographic Data

ID22010691
AuthorsJing Meng (0000-0003-3667-6419, Shenzhen University), Haiyan Wang (0000-0003-2534-6756, University of Macau, corresponding author)
Year2025
Pages1-20
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDigital Journalism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2167-0811 • E-ISSN: 2167-082X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/21670811.2025.2567349
OpenAlexW4414705097
LanguageEN
References cited70

This study explores how journalist podcasters and their podcasts function as alternative news media within the Chinese media landscape. It argues that journalist podcasters do not explicitly assert their alternativeness, instead, they adopt non-confrontational approaches to create alternative spaces for public discussion and deliberation. They reinvent journalistic professionalism as a counterstrategy, negotiate between professionalization and personalization, and resist the dictates of algorithms and platforms. This research contributes to the current understanding of alternative media by framing the concept as contextual and relational, particularly highlighting how alternatives are constructed and practiced in relation to platform power and data technology. Thus, alternativeness, much like mainstream media, remains a contested concept. This constrained sense of alternativeness, while offering some liberation, also imposes limitations

China · Journalism · Media Studies and Communication · Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media

Tools

Open DOI