Putting a Human Face on the Algorithm
Co-Designing Recommender Personae to Democratize News Recommender Systems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22010882 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence Van den Bogaert (0000-0002-5759-9240, KU Leuven, corresponding author), David Geerts (0000-0003-3933-9266, KU Leuven), J Harambam (0000-0002-8286-7147, KU Leuven) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1097-1117 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Digital Journalism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2167-0811 • E-ISSN: 2167-082X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21670811.2022.2097101 |
| OpenAlex | W4288701803 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 54 |
Algorithmic recommender systems are on the rise in various societal domains, including journalism. While they offer great promise by making useful selections of large content pools, they raise various ethical and societal concerns due to their alleged lack of transparency, diversity and agency. Especially in the news context, this has serious implications because access to information is crucial in democratic societies. In this article we empirically explore the idea of algorithmic recommender personae as a productive socio-technical solution to these problems. We present the results from a two-phased qualitative study with Dutch and Belgian news readers (N = 27) to 1) co-design potential news recommender personae by inductively discerning core news reading motivations and relevant features, and 2) evaluate the most promising personae on their usefulness. Results highlight three distinct recommender personae (Expert, Challenger and Unwinder) that correspond with news consumers’ most salient reading motivations. We conclude that, in an increasingly automated future, allowing users more control and including them when designing recommender systems is key. With this study we hope that media organizations take up the challenge towards developing human-centered and responsible algorithmic systems that serve the public good
Advertising · Business · Computer security · Journalism · Political science · Recommender system · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Games and Media · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Recommender Systems and Techniques
The News Gap
We Are Data
Technology and the Virtues
Interested in Diversity
Algorithmic Accountability
Algorithmic Transparency in the News Media
Do not blame it on the algorithm
Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems
Predictors of Internet Use
What’s APPening to news? A mixed-method audience-centred study on mobile news consumption
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015
We are what we click
How algorithms see their audience
Counting Clicks
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Explanations of news personalisation across countries and media types
On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders
News Media Old and New
Understanding the Audience Turn in Journalism
The 21st Century Media (R)evolution
Appreciating News Algorithms
User Perspectives on the News Personalisation Process
Making ‘The Daily Me
Between creative and quantified audiences
What clicks actually mean
How the machine 'thinks
When News Meets the Audience
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |