How to implement a perfect basic income experiment evidence from four countries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22011320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Enrico Nichelatti (0000-0003-3906-0089, University of Helsinki, corresponding author), Heikki Hiilamo (0000-0003-4886-4935, University of Helsinki), Olavi Kangas (University of Turku) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2169-9763 • E-ISSN: 2169-978X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/ics.2026.10097 |
| OpenAlex | W7167694647 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
This article presents a comparative analysis of four Basic Income (BI) experiments conducted between 2017 and 2019 in Finland, the Netherlands, Spain, and Uganda. While existing research has focused primarily on economic and behavioural outcomes, this study shifts attention to the political, institutional, and implementation dynamics that shape BI experiments. Drawing on policy implementation, diffusion, and social experimentation theories, the article examines how different governance structures, actor constellations, and institutional settings influenced the initiation, design, and interpretation of these trials. Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and semi-structured interviews, the study identifies key factors that facilitated implementation and policy impact. Findings reveal significant variation across cases, particularly in terms of design autonomy, stakeholder alignment, and political reception. The inclusion of Uganda challenges highlights the transformative potential of BI in low-income contexts. The article concludes by offering practical recommendations for designing more politically viable and institutionally grounded BI experiments
Basic income · Corporate governance · Politics · Qualitative research · Stakeholder · Transformative learning · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Models of the Welfare State
Why has the Covid-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income
Experimenting with Unconditional Basic Income
Basic income in crisis? (Hard) lessons from the pandemic
The Political Debate on Basic Income and Welfare Reform in Spain
A Policy Comet in Moominland? Basic Income in the Finnish Welfare State
Welfare States’ Social Investment Strategies and the Emergence of Dutch Experiments on a Minimum Income Guarantee
A Struggle for Framing and Interpretation
Parading Utopia on the road to nowhere? An introduction to the special issue on the policy impact of the European basic income experiments
A Truly Missed Opportunity
The policy and political consequences of the B-Mincome pilot project
Legitimising a radical policy idea
When and why do ideas matter? The influence of framing on opinion formation and policy change
Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research
Policy diffusion and policy transfer
From Rights to Activation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|