Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contemporary British Georgic Writing

Bibliographic Data

ID22011802
AuthorsTerry Gifford (0000-0003-3557-3901, Bath Spa University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume12
Issue2
Pages134-149
Publication date2021-10-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEcozon European Journal of Literature Culture and Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2171-9594 • E-ISSN: 2171-9594
PublisherUniversidad de Alcala (PUBLISHER • ES)
DOI10.37536/ecozona.2021.12.2.3828
OpenAlexW3210452634
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

Do we need the modish term “eco-georgics” to help us discover the unsentimental, holistic, healing qualities in the best georgic writing of the Anthropocene? When were georgics not “eco”? Is there a “post-georgic” in some forms of contemporary literature that seem to reject husbandry altogether, such as rewilding texts? Do such categories serve any purpose to readers and critics in the Anthropocene? This essay argues that such careful distinctions do, indeed, matter more than ever now as we reconsider our sustainable options in husbandry, land-management and what sustainability might look like, as it is represented and explored in our poetry, fiction and non-fiction georgic literature in Britain at the present. One might expect contemporary georgic writing to exemplify the environmental engagement implied in the term “eco-georgic”. In fact, contemporary georgic can be environmentally radical or apparently indirect in its implications for sustainability. It remains as diverse, hybrid and composted in the past as Virgil’s original text. This essay begins by considering definitions, with reference to Virgil’s founding Latin text, begun in the third decade BCE, the Georgics. It recognises Laura Sayre’s complaint that ecocriticism has neglected georgic writing, and argues that this is certainly true for contemporary British georgic texts. Briefly, attention is drawn to five volumes of georgic poetry before the essay focuses on contemporary georgic fiction and non-fiction. The novels of Cynan Jones, Tom Bullough, Marie-Elsa Bragg and Tim Pears are discussed and contrasted with one by Melissa Harrison that might mistakenly be thought of as georgic. Three categories of non-fiction are identified and discussed with examples: instructional georgic, personal memoir and future-oriented georgic. Consideration of the latter leads to conclusions about their inevitable overlaps and a final call for a radical twenty-first century animism to embed enchantment into contemporary georgic writing

Anthropocene · Art · Environmental ethics · Literature · Poetry · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Philosophy

  • Rewilding, Wilding, and the New Georgic in Contemporary Nature Writing

    Pippa Marland•Green Letters•2020

  • ‘The farming community revisited

    Dominic Head•Green Letters•2020

  • Eclogues in Extremis

    Seamus Heaney•Proceedings of the Royal Irish…•2003

  • Romantic Ecology

    Eric C Walker, Jonathan Bate et al.•Studies in Romanticism•1996

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae