A Method for Studying Moral Judgments-Further Considerations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2201602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Hosking Jones (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1943 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 492-497 |
| Publication date | 1943-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9602 • E-ISSN: 1537-5390 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/219216 |
| OpenAlex | W2032737602 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
The method for studying moral judgments discussed by Cuber and Pell is considered and several modifications suggested after the check study made at the University of Pennsylvania. Rank-order correlation of the two series was high, and the check series showed a tendency toward greater disapproval of situations presented. The situations were found to be meaningful for the respondents. The sex differences in response found by Cuber and Pell were also found by Jones. The Jones data also show significant differences in response by religious affiliation of respondents and in this respect differs from the Cuber and Pell data. The situational method of securing moral judgments provides the investigator with an additional instrument
Rank (graph theory) · Series (stratigraphy) · Situational ethics · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,02 |
| Citation span | 1945 - 1947 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |