Plotino e o argumento do terceiro homem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22016149 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luca Pitteloud (0000-0002-1864-5742, Universidade Federal do ABC, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 118 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Voluntas Revista Internacional de Filosofia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2179-3786 • E-ISSN: 1573-7888 |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.5902/2179378643334 |
| OpenAlex | W3022920264 |
| Language | PT |
| References cited | 4 |
This paper proposes to pose the question of a possible position of Plotinus with regard to the Argument of the Third Man (TMA): first, we will examine if it is possible to attribute to Plotinus a position as regards TMA such as it appears in the Parmenides, in particular with regard to the premise which affirms the self-predication (SP) of the Forms. Next, we will briefly consider how the question of the soul-body relationship can, to some extent, provide a better understanding of why Plotinus does not bother to give an explicit objection to TMA. Finally, we will analyze how the theory of two kinds of resemblance strikes a fatal blow to the spirit of TMA
Economics · Epistemology · Premise · Soul · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Linguistics and Language Studies · Medicine · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |