Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Change in the Dispersed Territory

(Proto)Types for a New Urban Paradigm

Bibliographic Data

ID22018007
AuthorsMaarten Gheysen (0000-0001-5785-9631, KU Leuven), Sophie Leemans (0000-0002-8069-6575, KU Leuven)
Year2022
Volume8
Issue1
Publication date2022-12-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v8i1.5949
OpenAlexW4311881511
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

Dispersed territories such as Flanders (Belgium) have been amongst others described as layered territories, as a palimpsest landscape, or as both a selective and a-selective infill of the territory. In the constant re-editing and change of this territory, historical remnants remain visible and often form a departing point for further adaptations and changes. One of these remnants, the moated farmstead, has evolved from a historical (proto)type to a common typology in South-West Flanders and enabled inhabiting the territory dispersedly. Moated farmsteads are typically composed of a series of different buildings and are surrounded by an artificial water body. The moat formed the central point of a larger land management system. Nowadays, many of these farmsteads still exist, however, over time they lost their original purpose and transformed into a variety of uses. The design of a prototype, i.e., a first model later evolving into a type, a recurring model, as an architectural object can simultaneously relate to a larger theoretical reflection on the scale of the territory. Subsequently, these farmsteads lead to the question: What (proto)types have been developed to demonstrate the uniqueness of the relation between the land/labour/living in a dispersed territory? Can we re-interpret the moated farmstead as a new (proto)type to establish a more sustainable way of urbanising the countryside in a dispersed context? Therefore, this article first documents the historical figure of the moated farmstead as an architectural object, socio-economic and political organisation, and ecological land management, and documents its change throughout time. Then, a reflection is built on how, at the time of their emergence, these moated farmsteads were an exponent of a sustainable and ground-breaking type that enabled a dispersed settlement pattern. Finally, the potential of the farmstead as a new prototype for a twenty-first-century dispersed territory is discussed

Archaeology · Economic geography · Geography · Infill · Land use · Palimpsest · Typology · French Urban and Social Studies · History · Sustainable Design and Development · Urban Planning and Landscape Design · Ecology

  • Urban Heritage in Transformation

    Open Access•Frank Eckardt, Aliaa AlSadaty•Urban Planning•2023

  • The notion of the node

    Sophie Leemans, Erik Van Daele et al.•Journal of Urban Design•2024

  • Sprawl

    Robert Bruegmann•Sprawl•2005

  • Light railways and the rural–urban continuum

    Open Access•Greet De Block, Janet Polasky et al.•Journal of Historical Geography•2011

  • Planning Rural-Urban Landscapes

    Greet De Block•Landscape Research•2014

  • The Land as Palimpsest

    Open Access•André Corboz•Diogenes•1983

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae