Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

In Praise of Diversity in Participatory Heritage Planning Empowered by Artificial Intelligence

Windcatchers in Yazd

Bibliographic Data

ID22018050
AuthorsMahda Foroughi (0000-0001-6051-6058, Delft University of Technology), Tong Wang (0000-0002-9483-0050, Delft University of Technology), Ana Pereira Roders (0000-0003-2571-9882, Delft University of Technology)
Year2025
Volume10
Publication date2025-01-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.8724
OpenAlexW4406369996
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited46

Heritage planning is changing, in both theory and practice. There is greater attention to the cultural significance (values and attributes) conveyed to a heritage property, rather than focusing on the property alone. Identifying and revealing this cultural significance has become a critical step in heritage planning. Moreover, international guidelines increasingly encourage public participation in defining the cultural significance of heritage sites. However, effectively involving diverse stakeholders and capturing the cultural significance they attribute to heritage remains a challenge, particularly when dealing with extensive datasets and multiple stakeholders. Although automated methods have shown potential in fields like digital humanities, their application in heritage planning is still limited. This article explores the innovative use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly text classification analysis, to analyze unstructured textual data (e.g., policy documents, literature, and social media) to uncover the cultural significance of built heritage. Focusing on Yazd, Iran, and specifically on windcatchers—a key cultural attribute recognized for its “outstanding universal value” by UNESCO—this study integrates AI to enhance both urban and socio-cultural planning. This article, as the concluding piece of a broader research project, synthesizes the project’s findings to highlight AI’s potential for inclusive heritage planning, referencing related publications of the same project to provide context while remaining concise. The research is structured in three phases: first, a literature review on AI applications in participatory heritage planning and value-based heritage planning; second, the methodology for data collection and analysis, including coding and comparing values and attributes of windcatchers conveyed by different stakeholders; and third, findings on the values and attributes, and their interrelationships as revealed through the data. The results confirm that while there are both conflicts and alignments in the cultural significance attributed to windcatchers in Yazd among various stakeholders, the theoretical framework presented here offers a valuable tool for heritage planning. By decoding and measuring cultural significance from diverse perspectives, this framework aids in identifying conflicts and alignments and in better aligning stakeholder perspectives. This model can be adapted to other key attributes in Yazd and other case studies, offering broader applications in heritage planning. Additionally, the findings underscore the potential of AI to evaluate the legislative framework’s effectiveness in enhancing public engagement

Archaeology · Citizen journalism · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Geography · Knowledge management · Sociology · World Wide Web · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation

  • Folk Art Festivals and Ai-Driven Visitor Analytics

    Open Access•Vyshnavi A Vyshnavi A, A Vyshnavi et al.•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2025

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Tong Wang, Neil Yorke‐Smith•Urban Planning•2025

  • Artificial Intelligence in Heritage Tourism

    Open Access•José Manuel Sánchez Martín, Rebeca Guillén Peñafiel et al.•Heritage•2025

  • Ai-Enhanced Cultural Heritage Learning Platforms

    Open Access•Swati Srivastava, Shivganga Gavhane et al.•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2026

  • Machine Translation for Folk Narratives in Education

    Open Access•Prashant Wakhare, P B Wakhare et al.•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2026

  • Street Science

    Jason Corburn•Street Science•2005

  • Towards smart sustainable cities

    Open Access•Islam Bouzguenda, Chaham Alalouch et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2019

  • Using Content Analysis to Probe the Cognitive Image of Intangible Cultural Heritage Tourism

    Open Access•Qihang Qiu, Mu Zhang•ISPRS International Journal of…•2021

  • Frameworks for citizens participation in planning

    Open Access•Donagh Horgan, Branka Dimitrijević•Sustainable Cities and Society•2019

  • Multilevel governance of sustainable energy policies

    Open Access•Giulia Melica, Paolo Bertoldi et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2018

  • Community Empowerment and Heritage Conservation

    Wentsung Den, Wen-Tsung Den•The Historic Environment Policy &…•2014

  • Discussing strategy in heritage conservation

    Open Access•Ioannis Poulios•Journal of Cultural Heritage…•2014

  • Leadership and collaborative planning

    Open Access•Fikri Zul Fahmi, Muhamad Ihsani Prawira et al.•Planning Theory•2015

  • Collaboration in community research

    Hans van Ewijk•European Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Capturing experts’ knowledge in heritage planning enhanced by AI

    Open Access•Mahda Foroughi, Bruno Andrade et al.•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2024

  • Valuing Urban Heritage Through Participatory Heritage Websites

    Open Access•Arno Van Der Hoeven•Space and Culture•2018

  • Community participation in cultural heritage management

    Open Access•Ji Li, Sukanya Krishnamurthy et al.•Cities•2019

  • Integration of indigenous people into sustainable development through the territorial analysis of their potential

    Open Access•Oscar Meza Palma, José-María Díaz-Puente•Land Use Policy•2024

  • A framework to analyse conflicts between residents and tourists

    Open Access•Carmo Sousa Rêgo, Joana Almeida•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Conflicts over Locally Unwanted Land Uses (Lulus)

    Open Access•Ilgi Atay Kaya, Nursen Kaya Erol•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Is all authenticity accepted by tourists and residents? The concept, dimensions and formation mechanism of negative authenticity

    Open Access•Qilou Zhou, Jie Zhang et al.•Tourism Management•2018

  • High mountains and the faraway emperor

    Open Access•Nicky Morrison, Simon Xian•Habitat International•2016

  • Capturing public voices

    Open Access•Mahda Foroughi, Bruno Andrade et al.•Habitat International•2023

  • Imagine the Old Town of Lijiang

    Open Access•Li Ji, Ji Li et al.•Habitat International•2021

  • Underlying social factors for evaluating heritage conservation in urban renewal districts

    Open Access•Esther H K Yung, Qi Zhang et al.•Habitat International•2017

  • Subjective valuation of tangible and intangible heritage neighbourhood attributes

    Open Access•Lidia E Bonet, Margarita Greene et al.•Habitat International•2020

  • Discourses of Nature Conservation and Heritage Management in the Past, Present and Future

    Open Access•Peter Skoglund, Eva Svensson•European Journal of Archaeology•2010

  • The good, the bad and the self-referential

    Kristof Van Assche, Martijn Duineveld•International Journal of Heritage…•2013

  • Mapping historic urban landscape values through social media

    Open Access•Manal Ginzarly, Ana Pereira Roders et al.•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2019

  • Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration

    Open Access•Paul J Maginn•Qualitative Research•2007

Citations per year5
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae