When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto’s Waterfront
New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22018132 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Constance Carr (0000-0003-1491-536X, University of Luxembourg), Mary Hesse (0000-0001-8472-2825, University of Luxembourg), Markus Hesse |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 69-83 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.v5i1.2519 |
| OpenAlex | W3011895305 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
| References cited | 51 |
‘Smart cities’ has become a hegemonic concept in urban discourses, despite substantial criticism presented by scholarly research and activism. The aim of this research was to understand what happens when one of the big digital corporations enters the field of real estate and land use development and urban planning, how existing institutions respond to this, and how modes of urban governance are affected. Alphabet Inc.’s plans for Toronto’s waterfront provided insights into these questions. Our investigations traced a complex web of place-making practices that involved all levels of government, the general public, and networks of actors throughout the private sector. Methodologically, the discourse was reconstructed with local fieldwork, interviews with key actors, participating in tours and public meetings, and secondary sources. It was found that Alphabet Inc.’s plan to build a world-class digital city contained some lessons for urban studies and urban planning practice. First, Alphabet Inc.’s plans, which unfolded amidst initiatives to expand the knowledge economy, confirmed concerns that the trajectory of neoliberal, market-driven land use and speculation along the waterfront remains unchanged. Second, digital infrastructures are potentially a Trojan Horse. Third, it was seen that municipalities and their modes of urban planning are vulnerable to the political economic manoeuvrings of large corporate power. Fourth, Alphabet Inc. operates as a post-political package driven by a new coalition of politics, where the smart city is sold as a neutral technology. The controversies surrounding the project, however, stirred a civic discourse that might signal a return of the political
Civil engineering · Corporate governance · Economics · Economy · Management · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Real estate · Smart city · Sociology · Urban planning · Engineering · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Law · Public Administration · Smart Cities and Technologies
Smart city trends
Platformization of Urban Life
Power and Ethical Concerns in the Integration of Smart City Technologies
Strategic digital city
Future-proofing the city
Urban Planning and the Smart City
Substantively smart cities – Participation, fundamental rights and temporality
Amazon’s HQ2 Site Selection Criteria
Technocratic Urban Development
Is civic data governance the key to democratic smart cities? The role of the urban data trust in Sidewalk Toronto
Evaluating Collaborative Public–Private Partnerships
Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities
Alternatives to smart cities
Social justice implications of smart urban technologies
Glitch epistemologies for computational cities
Urban neoliberalism, smart city, and Big Tech
Consultancy State
Contested autonomy in “smart” and “inclusive” innovation
Risk and Approaches to Risk-Taking in Testbed Planning
Mapping the clouds
Automatic for the people? Problematising the potential of digital planning
Google, a major stakeholder in local governance
Post-political clouds
Beyond the professional–local knowledge dichotomy
Imagining post‐war futures amid cycles of destruction and efforts of reconstruction
Re-thinking urban infrastructures as spaces of learning
Global technology companies and the politics of urban socio-technical imaginaries in the digital age
Some Reflections on the Limitations to Public Participation in the Post-Political City
The Post-Political and Its Discontents
Reshaping Toronto's Waterfront
Examining regional competitiveness and the pressures of rapid growth
Secure the city, revitalize the zone
Post-politics contested
The Variegated Economics and the Potential Politics of the Smart City
The ‘actually existing smart city’
Critical interventions into the corporate smart city
Thinking about smart cities
Making sense of smart cities
Castles in Toronto’s Sky
Rescaling Ambitions
Recovering the politics of the city
Digital turn, digital geographies
Introduction
The ecosystem approach and the global imperative on Toronto’s Central Waterfront
Introduction to “Political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations”
Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”
Toronto Inc? Planning the Competitive City in the New Toronto
The search for territorial fixes in subnational governance
Governing urbanism
The knowledge economy city
The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city
Urban Politics Reconsidered
Sustainable Urban Development as Consensual Practice
Situated responses to the post‐political city
Neither Shoreditch nor Manhattan
Progress Report—Urban Political Ecology
Will the real smart city please stand up
Urban Political Ecology1
The walking interview
Catching the whale
The post-politics of transport
Planning the post-political city
Selling Smartness
The Influence of Google on Urban Policy in Developing Countries
Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology
Imagining the carbon neutral city
It's Not Going to be Suburban, It's Going to be All Urban
Old Mega-Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 26 |