Big Science, Ethics, and the Scalar Effects of Urban Planning

Bibliographic Data

ID22018223
AuthorsSandra Kopljar (0000-0001-6658-3577, Lund University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume5
Issue4
Pages217-226
Publication date2020-11-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v5i4.3289
OpenAlexW3102668764
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited16

The urban expansion currently under development around the two materials science facilities MAX IV and European Spallation Source in Lund, Sweden, surrounds two meticulously designed research facilities steered by global demands. The new urban area, together with the research facilities dedicated to science and the development of knowledge, expands the city of Lund onto high-quality agricultural land. In doing so, the municipal planning is attempting to align contemporary ideas of sustainable urban development with large-scale scientific infrastructure. This actualizes an ethical dilemma as the urban expansion onto productive agricultural land overrides previous decisions taken by the municipality regarding land use. It can also be understood as going against national land use policy which states that development on productive agricultural land should be avoided. As the planning stands today, the research facilities heavily push local urban development into the area while the intended research outcomes primarily relate to a global research community tied to international scientific demands for materials science. Although the Brunnshög area is realized through a neutralizing planning strategy, thought to balance and compensate for the development on farmland, the effects of the counterbalancing acts are primarily played out at a local urban level in terms of diverse, exciting, and locally sustainable neighbourhoods. The land use protection policies meant to secure national food production rather operates on a national scale. The argument made in this text is that sustainable development, and the intended balancing acts it involves, ought to be carefully considered in terms of scalar effects. Sustainable planning effects’ scalar extent should be taken into account through careful assessment of the step between good intentions and expected outcomes

Business · Civil engineering · Dilemma · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Political science · Sustainable development · Urban planning · Engineering · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Law · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access