Straddling the Fence
Land Use Patterns in and around Ports as Hidden Designers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22018474 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucija Ažman Momirski (0000-0002-9244-3348, University of Ljubljana), Yvonne van Mil (0000-0002-9188-7369, Delft University of Technology), Carola Hein (0000-0003-0551-5778, Delft University of Technology) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 136-151 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.v6i3.4101 |
| OpenAlex | W3183358058 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 25 |
Ports are clearly demarcated structures on land and water. They are fenced in, easily recognizable on satellite and orthophoto images, and they have specific functions. This apparent clarity of ports, their function and outline, in relation to nearby urban and rural areas, becomes more complex when explored through the lens of land use, that is the existing and planned future functional dimension or socio-economic purpose of the land. In contrast to urban and rural areas, where land use has been mapped and defined for centuries, the use and function of land and water in port areas has long been multifunctional and not defined on land use maps. This raises questions about the role and understanding of port territory in relation to neighboring spaces, past, and present. This article first defines land use and describes its historical development. Scholars from various disciplines, including geographers, planners, and economists, have addressed the issue of land use in port areas. Land use patterns have emerged over time and are based on earlier demarcations of port areas and distinctions between port and city. As shown by the historical port city borders in Hamburg, Rotterdam, and Koper, these delimitations can change over time, by location and by function. The land use register has only recently been harmonized at the European level. European and national registers distinguish existing and planned land use in port areas differently. Mixed uses prevail in new port interventions, creating a new kind of permeability or porosity; that is, areas where port, urban and rural functions merge. New land use porosity is a particular state of land use (on both sides of the boundaries of port areas) that goes beyond the physical boundaries marked by fences. Land use porosity effectively creates land use continuity, a functional porosity that serves as a hidden blueprint for future planning. Understanding land use porosity can provide a foundation for novel approaches to the development of transition strategies that are needed to address contemporary challenges, including climate change and sea level rise, digitization, and new work and life practices in port city regions. In conclusion, we note that due to the porosity of land use patterns, the separation between the present port and the city is beginning to crumble. However, this process has yet to be made fully visible and used as a basis for design
Civil engineering · CLARITY · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Regional science · 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science
Struggling for Leadership
The Cadastral Map in the Service of the State
Early medieval port customs, tolls and controls on foreign trade
Spatial Glocalization in Asia-Pacific Hub Port Cities
Oil Spaces
The port—City interface
A tale of Asia’s world ports
Waterfront Land Use in the Six Australian State Capitals 1
Shifts in Strategic Spatial Planning? Some Evidence from Europe and Australia
Old Refineries Rarely Die
A Comparison of Waterfront Land Use in Four Canadian Ports
The Appointment of Ports
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |