Co-Production Between Insurgency and Exploitation
Promises and Precarities of a Traveling Concept
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22018649 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sophie Schramm (0000-0002-6194-9530, TU Dortmund University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.8235 |
| OpenAlex | W4393191627 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 8 |
Co-production has inspired planning practice and research in the past decades. Along with its appropriation in the planning literature it has undergone manifold translations and its boundaries have become blurry. In this commentary I propose a conceptualisation of co-production not only as efficient service provision by citizens and state actors together but furthermore as a kind of city-making that has transformative potential beyond concrete interventions in the present moment. This matters because it enables a conceptual discrimination between co-production and the exploitation of marginalised people’s resources, time, and labour. I argue that the necessity of this discrimination becomes apparent when analysing co-productive efforts in their embeddedness in space and time
Economics · Insurgency · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |