Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Co-Evolution of Aerial Survey Technology and Epistemic Injustice

From Colonial Instruments to Digital Scanners in Cambodia

Bibliographic Data

ID22018945
AuthorsSayumphu Ros (0009-0008-3422-8659, Institute of Technology of Cambodia, corresponding author), Sayumphu Ros Sayumphu Ros
Year2025
Volume8
Issue3
Pages75-85
Publication date2025-10-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHerança (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2184-3090 • E-ISSN: 2184-3090
PublisherUK Zhende Publishing Limited Company (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.52152/heranca.v8i3.1197
OpenAlexW4415723350
LanguageEN

This article investigates the co-evolution of aerial survey technology and epistemic injustice in Cambodian archaeology, tracing developments from French colonial photogrammetry to contemporary LiDAR mapping. Using Science and Technology Studies (STS) approach grounded in Actor–Network Theory (ANT), it examines how human and non-human actors, colonial surveyors, satellites, algorithms, GIS systems, interact to shape heritage narratives and constrain Khmer epistemologies. The analysis is enhanced by four conceptual tools that aim to highlight the differences in meaning across epistemic systems, insider versus outsider interpretations, and its potential impact on the erasure of local knowledge systems. These frameworks reveal how aerial technologies embed asymmetrical power relations, privileging etic, external classifications over emic, local understandings, and reclassifying spiritual and living heritage as static data points. The article contributes to the ongoing decolonization of digital archaeology, particularly the shift from participation alone to network reconfiguration, and to propose an enforceable ethics architecture, instead of siloed efforts such as research permits, MoUs, data-deposit rules, and co-interpretation protocols, to secure data sovereignty, shared authorship, and community benefit. While LiDAR offers unprecedented mapping capabilities, its deployment without equitable access, co-interpretation, and community benefit risks reproducing colonial legacies. The article concludes with structural reform proposals such as data sovereignty clauses, dual interpretive layers, and capacity-building measures to reconfigure archaeological networks toward epistemic justice and ethical technological integration, ensuring Khmer heritage is understood and represented on its own terms

Actor–network theory · Colonialism · Decolonization · Economic Justice · Epistemic community · Interrogation · Photogrammetry · Sovereignty · Traditional knowledge · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Cambodian History and Society

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae