Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Safe-and-sustainable-by-design redox active molecules for energy storage applications

Bibliographic Data

ID22019710
AuthorsClemens Wolf (Bio Forschung Austria, corresponding author), Janine Maier (0009-0008-0598-1342, Graz University of Technology), Julia Wenger (0000-0002-6785-5826, Graz University of Technology), Georg Rudelstorfer (0000-0002-6911-3287, Graz University of Technology), Christian Leypold (Graz University of Technology), Julia Voglhuber-Höller (Bio Forschung Austria), Matiss Reinfelds (0000-0003-1745-014X, Bio Forschung Austria), Andrea Weiner, Andrea M J Weiner (0000-0002-5902-8687, CIC biomaGUNE), Arantza Muriana (0000-0002-1938-0766, CIC biomaGUNE), Susanne Lux (0000-0003-1821-910X, Graz University of Technology), Claudia Mair‐Bauernfeind (0000-0002-4287-3008, Graz University of Technology), Andreas Falk (0000-0002-1133-5215, Bio Forschung Austria), Stefan Spirk (0000-0002-9220-3440, Graz University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue1
Publication date2025-02-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnergy Sustainability and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2192-0567 • E-ISSN: 2192-0567
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s13705-024-00503-x
OpenAlexW4407151075
LanguageEN
References cited47

Sustainability aspects have become a main criterion for design next to performance of material and product. Particularly the emerging field of energy storage and conversion is striving towards more sustainable solutions. However, implementing sustainability considerations during the design and development phase of energy materials and products is challenging due to the complexity and broadness of the different dimensions of sustainability. Here, we demonstrate that by using the principles of Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), a concept can be formulated. This concept served as the basis for selecting and evaluating criteria and performance parameters aimed at enhancing the safety and sustainability aspects of redox active molecules in an organic redox flow battery. Following an iterative approach, the collected data provided valuable insights enabling us to fine-tune and enhance the materials and processes in alignment with the identified parameters. (Social) life cycle assessment focused on the workflow from sourcing, processing and generation of intermediate products to the quinone used in the redox flow batteries and revealed important insights, highlighting critical steps in the process chain. Additionally, we identified two specific points of intervention regarding solvent and quinone choice, based on sustainability parameters. The proposed solvent change resulted in a greener alternative [changed from tetrahydrofuran (THF) to 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran (MTHF)], and the ecotoxicity testing revealed MGQ and MHQS to be improved options. However, we also faced severe challenges regarding access to reliable LCA data on the raw material sourcing. Taken together, the modified designs led to safer and more sustainable redox active materials for both humans and the environment at lab scale. Implementing the results mentioned above to further expedite the technology will ultimately pave the way to more sustainable energy storage applications. This study proved the value of implementing of an SSbD concept in battery development is the main result of this study

Business · Economics · Energy storage · Environmental economics · Natural resource economics · Physics · Political science · Redox · Renewable energy · Sustainable development · Sustainable Energy · Advanced battery technologies research · Chemistry · Conducting polymers and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Engineering · Environmental Science

  • Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment

    Open Access•Göran Finnveden, Michael Zwicky Hauschild et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2009

  • Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies

    Open Access•Joule Bergerson, Joule A Bergerson et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2020

  • Categorising tools for sustainability assessment

    Open Access•B Ne, Barry Ness et al.•Ecological Economics•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae