Understanding the characteristics of the green, circular and bioeconomy models within the context of sustainable development
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22019906 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michelle A Urrea Vivas (0000-0002-8886-4879, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, corresponding author), Luis Alberto Seguí-Amortegui (0000-0003-2470-2456, Universidad Internacional De La Rioja), Hilda Rosalba Guerrero García Rojas (0000-0002-4226-8027, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Energy Sustainability and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2192-0567 • E-ISSN: 2192-0567 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13705-025-00528-w |
| OpenAlex | W4411498848 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 114 |
This paper aims to analyze, synthesize and evaluate the main differences, similarities, advantages, and disadvantages of the narratives of green economy (GE), circular economy (CE) and bioeconomy (BE) models within a sustainability framework. The article seeks to provide a critical comparison of the notion of three models, related in their concepts, approaches and tools, as well as establish and analyze the strategies that lead to a change in the dominant paradigms in sustainability applications. The emerging green, circular and bioeconomy approaches focus on proposing strategies that lead to sustainability. This study shows that despite their notable conceptual differences, a model that adapts to rapid changes in the needs and limitations of natural resources is common across all approaches. However, in terms of analysis and application, they are not always clear because of the complexity of differentiating approaches, conceptual incorporation frameworks and analytical tools. The results show that, in the environmental dimension, the circular economy and bioeconomy focus on resource management, whereas the green economy starts by analyzing ecological processes to reduce environmental risk and ecological scarcity. In the economic dimension, the circular economy aims to decouple economic growth from environmental pressure, whereas the bioeconomy emphasizes the processing and enhancement of biological raw materials to foster new value chains. The findings of this paper clarify the limits, synergies, and differences in sustainability between the concepts of the green economy (GE), the circular economy (CE) and the bioeconomy (BE), and address gaps in the literature. These concepts continue to be limited by their economic growth; limits in the interrelation between the biosphere and individuals; and specific assessments of the environmental, social, and economic aspects of sustainable management
Economics · Geography · Natural resource economics · Political science · Regional science · Sustainable development · Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Sustainable Industrial Ecology · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Beyond Growth
Global Change and the Earth System
Prosperity without Growth
World Development Report 1992
Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy”
Green, circular, bio economy
The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources
A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices
Green innovation in technology and innovation management – an exploratory literature review
The Boundaries of the Planetary Boundary Framework
How to understand and measure environmental sustainability
Green economy and related concepts
A framework for strategic sustainable development
Industrial ecology
From circular business models to circular business ecosystems
The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth
Sustainability in the Circular Economy
What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature
The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?
A review on circular economy
A safe operating space for humanity
Green Political Thought
Decoupling for ecological sustainability
Green Economy – the Next Oxymoron? No Lessons Learned from Failures of Implementing Sustainable Development
The foundations of the environmental rebound effect and its contribution towards a general framework
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
A time use perspective on the materials intensity of consumption
Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals
Jevons' paradox
Technological progress and sustainable development
Ecological Economics
The physical dimension of international trade, part 2
Many pathways toward sustainability
Putting a circular economy into practice in China
Rethinking blue economy governance – A blue economy equity model as an approach to operationalise equity
Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy
Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation
Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services
Cleantech clusters
Reconciling sustainability, systems theory and discounting
Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework
Embedding circularity
The Circular Economy
Does circular economy mitigate the extraction of natural resources? Empirical evidence based on analysis of 28 European economies over the past decade
Circular Economy
Making sense of the green economy
The Rise and Fall of the Limits to Growth Debate
Sustainability and development after Covid-19
An Outline of General System Theory
Transaction costs and the transition to environmentally sustainable development
Economic growth and the environment
The social dimension of sustainable development
Socially Sustainable Economic De-growth
Transforming Innovation for Sustainability
Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science
Analyzing the Concept of Planetary Boundaries from a Strategic Sustainability Perspective
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |