Claims to universal norms and the forging of transnational networks

Struggles over the meaning of gender-based and sexual violence in conflicts

Bibliographic Data

ID22020147
AuthorsMichaela Zöhrer (0009-0005-1253-9251, University of Augsburg, corresponding author), Christian Methfessel (Institut für Zeitgeschichte München–Berlin), Daniel Stahl (0000-0001-5550-4458, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)
Year2024
Volume13
Issue2
Pages417-426
Publication date2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueZeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2192-1741 • E-ISSN: 2524-6976
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s42597-024-00138-x
OpenAlexW4407321027
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited9

The article analyzes the ways in which claims to universal norms promote, or complicate, collaboration in the context of transnational activism. It emphasizes the potential of a constructivist understanding of universality, i.e. not as something intrinsic to certain norms, but rather as an empirically powerful assumption and a strategic tool. The argumentation is based on two case studies. The first looks at how networks of transnational solidarity were formed and conflicts between activist groups emerged in response to conflict-related sexual violence committed during the Bosnian War. The second example looks at responses to the crimes committed by ISIS in Iraq in 2014 and beyond, demonstrating how shifts within the field of transitional justice, and in particular the emergence of norms centered on the concerns and participation of survivors, have shaped the building of networks around the right to reparation

Criminology · Forging · Political science · Psychotherapist · Sexual violence · Sociology · Engineering · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Psychology · Mechanical Engineering

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access