Persuasion illustrated
Motivating people to undertake self-protective measures in case of floods using 3D animation focused on components of protection motivation theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22025475 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Grzegorz Banerski (0000-0002-5499-1685, National Information Processing Institute, corresponding author), Katarzyna Abramczuk (0000-0003-2249-9888, University of Warsaw) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Pages | 103575 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103575 |
| OpenAlex | W4319072935 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
This study examines whether motivation to take protective measures in the case of flood risk can be increased using 3D-enhanced messages that emphasize various components of the protection motivation theory (PMT). It also tests the ability to memorise self-protective actions and the assumptions of PMT –including the processing of perceived risk. The study involved a field experiment implemented as a computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) with video material. We divided the subjects (n=740) into six groups; each watched a 3D-enhanced alert message that informed the flood risks and listed recommended countermeasures. The messages differed in 3D animations illustrating selected components of PMT. Warning messages illustrating selected components of PMT were more effective in motivating subjects to act compared to the base condition; however, this was not the case when the messages focused on the probability of threat. Additional visualisations in the messages did not impair the subjects’ ability to recall self-protective actions. Using an augmented PMT model with the interdependence of the threat and coping appraisal process leads to a significant improvement in fit. Warning messages are more effective in motivating people to act if they are accompanied by additional persuasive communication based on PMT (i.e. low cost of taking action, the efficiency of this action, self-efficacy, threat severity). Focusing only on threat probability is ineffective. Additionally, messages conveying only what protective measures participants should take should be avoided, because people tend to perceive the cost of action as too high and this weakens their intentions to perform it
Animation · Computer security · Motivation theory · Persuasion · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Psychology · Social Psychology
Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes
The Probability Weighting Function
Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation
Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints
Perception and Communication of Flood Risks
Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design
A Meta‐Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory
Making Reliability Reliable
Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria
Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks
The theory of planned behavior
Prospect Theory
Social learning theory
Disaster Education, Communication and Engagement
The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality
Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat
Appealing to fear
Risk as feelings
Effects of fear-arousing communications
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |