Land use planning across the wildfire disaster cycle
A systematic review of academic and policy classifications
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22025509 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tasnim Isaba (0000-0002-6236-7305, Texas A&M University System, corresponding author), Divya Chandrasekhar (0000-0003-2591-6923, University of Utah), Arthur Shraer Fainkich (University of Utah) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 142 |
| Pages | 106235 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106235 |
| OpenAlex | W7162750210 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 67 |
Despite the growing integration of land use planning in wildfire risk reduction, limited research has systematically examined how specific strategies are classified across the phases of the disaster management cycle. This study addresses that gap by evaluating the classification of wildfire-related land use strategies across preparedness, response, mitigation, adaptation, and recovery within both academic and policy domains. This study focuses specifically on the United States context, drawing on federal and state-level policy documents and peer-reviewed academic literature from the U.S. wildfire governance landscape. Using a systematic review methodology guided by the PRISMA framework, we analyzed 92 peer-reviewed academic articles and 41 federal and state policy documents published between 2007 and 2024. Academic sources were identified through structured keyword searches in Scopus and Web of Science, while policy documents were drawn from wildfire-prone states and relevant federal agencies. Each source was coded using a standardized framework encompassing five land use strategy categories and 23 indicators. Our results reveal notable classification discrepancies. Academic literature strongly emphasizes mitigation (74%), whereas policy documents show a more balanced focus between mitigation (51.6%) and preparedness (40.5%). While strategies such as defensible space and building materials exhibit high consensus in being tied to mitigation across both domains, preventative land use management strategies, zoning regulations, and subdivision regulations vary considerably in how they are classified across phases, with chi-square tests confirming that these differences are statistically significant. Temporal analysis of phase classification reveals a post-2018 increase in preparedness-oriented classifications in policy documents, particularly for subdivision regulations, reflecting responses to major wildfire events like the Camp Fire. Recovery and adaptation assignments to land use strategies remain consistently underrepresented across all years and source types. These findings highlight persistent implementation barriers driven by classification inconsistencies and underscore the need for integrated, multi-phase frameworks that align funding criteria, planning guidance, and institutional language with the complex functions of wildfire-related land use strategies
Corporate governance · Emergency management · Land use · Land-use planning · Preparedness · Scopus · Subdivision · Zoning · Disaster Management and Resilience · Fire effects on ecosystems · Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery
Adaptation to Climate Change
Planning with Complexity
Making Governments Plan
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Learning to coexist with wildfire
Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk
Increasing western US forest wildfire activity
Climate adaptation planning in practice
Moving from agenda to action
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests
Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes
Searching for the Good Plan
How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface
Planning for Resiliency
Evaluation of Networks of Plans and Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change
Insights into how Community Wildfire Protection Plans act as drivers of wildfire preparedness
Sustainable Disaster Recovery
Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research
Urban Hazard Mitigation
Creating Hazard Resilient Communities through Land-Use Planning
Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk
Critically assessing the idea of wildfire managed retreat
Natural hazard mitigation in local comprehensive plans
Strategic retreat for resilient and equitable climate adaptation
Adaptive capacity to climate change
There is no planning—only planning practices
Land Use Planning for Climate Adaptation
The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
Impacts of Federal and State Hazard Mitigation Policies on Local Land Use Policy
Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why
Rebuild or Relocate? Resilience and Postdisaster Decision‐Making After Hurricane Sandy
Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency
"The Science of "Muddling Through
Resilience
The geographies of community disaster resilience
| Highly cited | No |
|---|