Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Practical considerations of implementing disaster crisis standards of care in the intensive care unit

A scoping review

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22025687
AutoresDavid Sellers (0000-0001-6838-1354, Griffith University, autor de correspondencia), Lynda Hughes (0000-0002-4776-5065, Griffith University), Julia Crilly (0000-0002-1455-8983, Griffith University), Jamie Ranse (0000-0002-5265-6365, Griffith University)
Año2024
Volumen105
Páginas104412
Fecha de publicación2024-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2212-4209
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104412
OpenAlexW4392875619
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas36

Disasters have the potential to cause a surge of patients, some of which may require admission to an intensive care unit. Due to the high resource requirements of intensive care units, standards of care may need to be altered during a disaster to treat more people with limited resources, a care model referred to as ‘crisis standards of care’. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the practical considerations of implementing crisis standards of care in intensive care units during patient surges resulting from disasters. Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, most of the 19 studies included in this review were qualitative in design, undertaken in developed countries and focused on COVID-19. Adequate space, human resources, and physical resources were required for standard patient care in ICUs. When unbalanced, contingency measures or crisis standards of care were implemented, and adjustment to ICU governance was required. During times of crisis standards of care implementation, healthcare practitioner wellbeing was impacted. Continued efforts to support the ICU workforce before, during and after a disaster are warranted

Business · Intensive care medicine · Intensive care unit · Medical emergency · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Engineering · Medicine · Psychology · Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Assessing public health emergency preparedness

    Open Access•Scott Chiossi, Svetla Tsolova et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2021

  • Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care

    Jonathon P Leider, Debra DeBruin et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2017

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae