The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22026188 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marie-Sophie Attems (0000-0002-6117-2741, BOKU University, corresponding author), Thomas Thaler (0000-0003-3869-3722, BOKU University), Karin A W Snel (0000-0002-5287-942X, Utrecht University), Peter Davids (0000-0002-5349-8813, Ghent University), Thomas Hartmann (0000-0001-6707-7174, Wageningen University & Research), Sven Fuch (0000-0002-0644-2876, BOKU University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Pages | 101618 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101618 |
| OpenAlex | W3019771792 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 72 |
Hydro-meteorological hazards annually lead to considerable economic losses worldwide. Property level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures have shown to decrease potential damages by floods and other hazards. However, such measures are often implemented inadequately, frequently because of lacking communication between public administration and homeowners. Thus, risk communication systems have been created by multiple actors, ranging from the government to private companies and insurance groups, which have the goal to communicate risks to homeowners and businesses in a tailored manner. Consequently, adaptive behaviour can be triggered by risk communication. This paper conducted a cross-comparison of several risk communication systems which encompassed an output in the shape of a label or guideline, based on semi-structured interviews with relevant experts. One system, the German Hochwasserpass, was focused on in more detail. The results show that risk communication systems should include participatory approaches with experts to trigger adaptive behaviour. However, even in an example including mutual knowledge transfer a gap between knowledge about mitigation measures and actually implementing them was present. Thus, this implies going a step beyond, which ultimately questions the resource efficiency of such risk communication systems on a larger scale
Actuarial science · Business · Communications system · Computer security · Damages · Economics · Environmental resource management · Risk assessment · Risk communication · Risk management · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Psychology · Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research · Finance
Education in Occupational Health and Safety Location in Employee Communication
Perceived Risk and Intentions to Practice Health Protective Behaviors in a Mining-Impacted Region
Tailored Flood Risk Communication
Influence of flood risk communication on threat and coping appraisals of individuals to enhance flood resilience
Effects of website-based risk communication of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields on general public
The effect of government information release on public protective behaviors during the emerging infectious diseases epidemic in China
Progress and landscape of disaster science
Mind the gap
Multidimensional resilience - flood recovery on private land
Communicating Covid-19 risk changes
Flood risk quantification and mapping
Scalable pluvial flood risk assessment
Let's talk about flood risk – Evaluating a series of workshops on private flood protection
Impacts of social contracts for citizens in the austrian flood risk management system
Short-term panel data analysis of the effect of flood risk communication on individual evacuation decisions
Bottom-up innovations in natural hazard risk management in Austria
Less is More? Evaluating Technical Aspects and User Experiences of Smart Flood Risk Assessment Tools
Flood-Resilient Communities
Conceptualising risk communication barriers to household flood preparedness
Can positional concerns be a threat to disaster management? Assessing the prevalence of positional concerns among socially vulnerable populations in Trinidad & Tobago
Enhancing risk governance by addressing key risk communication barriers during the prevention and preparedness phase in South Tyrol (Italy)
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior
Threat, coping and flood prevention – A meta-analysis
Understanding communication dynamics on Twitter during natural disasters
Perception and Communication of Flood Risks
Risk perception and volcanic hazard mitigation
Insights into Flood‐Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory
The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness
Does Communicating (Flood) Risk Affect (Flood) Risk Perceptions? Results of a Quasi‐Experimental Study
Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation
The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged
Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk
Risk interpretation and action
Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping
Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management
Making sense of natural hazard mitigation
Climate change and urban resilience
Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households
The effectiveness of flood risk communication strategies and the influence of social networks—Insights from an agent-based model
The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation
Unpacking Protection Motivation Theory
Risk communication
The effect of flood experience on household mitigation—Evidence from longitudinal and insurance data
Framing of risk and preferences for annual and multi-year flood insurance
What Drives People's Willingness to Discuss Local Landscape Development
Fear Won't Do It
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems
Flood Perception and Mitigation
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |