Examining what factors affect firefighter decisions to declare a major incident
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22026646 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sara Waring (0000-0003-1625-5705, University of Liverpool, corresponding author), Beth Hillon (University of Liverpool) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 116 |
| Pages | 105098 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105098 |
| OpenAlex | W4405398766 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
‘Disasters’ or ‘major incidents’ (MIs) are large emergencies that result in mass casualties and major disruptions. Evidence repeatedly highlights delays in decisions to formally declare MIs, impacting incident command, resourcing, and the scale of damage. To date, limited research focus has been directed toward understanding the causes of these issues. Accordingly, the following study draws on interviews conducted with 12 firefighters from the UK to examine what factors affect decisions to declare a MI and why. Thematic Analysis highlighted 5 key themes: 1) Characteristics of Major Incidents ; 2) Knowledge ; 3) Experience ; 4) Environmental Pressure ; and 5) Accountability and Reputation . Findings indicate that ability to decide when to declare a MI is facilitated by knowledge of features characterising these incidents, support mechanisms implemented, local hazards, and incident response experience. Decisions are hindered by anxiety about increased scrutiny MIs can attract. Findings pose important implications for disaster response theory, training, and guidance
Business · Environmental health · Forensic engineering · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Disaster Management and Resilience · Engineering · Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Psychology · Risk and Safety Analysis
Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation
Methodological fit in management field research
Naturalistic Decision Making
Thematic analysis of qualitative research data
Sample size for qualitative research
What components of emergency preparedness exercises improve healthcare practitioners’ emergency response learning
Identifying what components of full-scale emergency exercises improve disaster response learning
Shedding the cobra effect
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research
How Uncertainty and Accountability can Derail Strategic ‘Save Life’ Decisions in Counter‐Terrorism Simulations
Disaster Planning and Risk Communication With Vulnerable Communities
Redundant deliberation about negative consequences
Taking stock of naturalistic decision making
Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research
The Status of Method
| Highly cited | No |
|---|