Social sensing of flood impacts in India
A case study of Kerala 2018
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22026682 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James C Young (0000-0002-9512-9477, University of Exeter, corresponding author), Rudy Arthur (0000-0001-7722-9522, University of Exeter), Michelle Spruce (0000-0002-1744-8165, University of Exeter), H Williams (0000-0002-5927-3367, Turing Institute) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Pages | 102908 |
| Publication date | 2022-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102908 |
| OpenAlex | W4221123122 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 26 |
Flooding is a major hazard that is responsible for substantial damage and risks to human health worldwide. The 2018 flood event in Kerala, India, killed 433 people and displaced more than 1 million people from their homes. Accurate and timely information can help mitigate the impacts of flooding through better preparedness (e.g. forecasting of flood impacts) and situational awareness (e.g. more effective civil response and relief). However, good information on flood impacts is difficult to source; governmental records are often slow and costly to produce, while insurance claim data is commercially sensitive and does not exist for many vulnerable populations. Here we explore “social sensing” – the systematic collection and analysis of social media data to observe real-world events – as a method to locate and characterise the impacts (social, economic and other) of the 2018 Kerala Floods. Data is collected from two social media platforms, Telegram and Twitter, as well as a citizen-produced relief coordination web application, Kerala Rescue, and a government flood damage database, Rebuild Kerala. After careful filtering to retain only flood-related social media posts, content is analysed to map the extent of flood impacts and to identify different kinds of impact (e.g. requests for help, reports of medical or other issues). Maps of flood impacts derived from Telegram and Twitter both show substantial agreement with Kerala Rescue and the damage reports from Rebuild Kerala. Social media content also detects similar kinds of impact to those reported through the more structured Kerala Rescue application. Overall, the results suggest that social sensing can be an effective source of flood impact information that produces outputs in broad agreement with government sources. Furthermore, social sensing information can be produced in near real-time, whereas government records take several months to produce. This suggests that social sensing may be a useful data source to guide decisions around flood relief and emergency response
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Emergency management · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Flood myth · Geography · Hazard · Political science · Preparedness · Social media · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Using social media data to construct and analyze knowledge graph for "7.20" Henan rainstorm flood event
Implementing a routine and standard approach for the automatic collection of socio-economic impact observations for impact-based forecasting and warning
Is the noise still going on? Predicting repeat noise complaints with historical time course and random forest classifiers
Modelling evacuation preparation time prior to floods
Study on the regional image of China (Tianjin) pilot free trade zone from the perspective of news big data
Attribution analysis of spatial mismatch between flood risk and public response
More than just Tweets
| Citations per year | 1.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |