A systematic framework for assessing social vulnerability to flood for integrated flood risk management
A case study in Metro Manila, Philippines
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22027901 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Judy Marie T Dulawan (0009-0000-3243-4952, Tokyo Metropolitan University), Yoshiyuki Imamura (Tokyo Metropolitan University, autor de correspondencia), Toru Konishi (Tokyo Metropolitan University), Hideo Amaguchi (Tokyo Metropolitan University), Miho Ohara (The University of Tokyo) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 112 |
| Páginas | 104778 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104778 |
| OpenAlex | W4401806761 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
Assessing social vulnerability to floods (SVF) is a crucial component of integrated flood risk management, especially in flood-prone regions such as Metro Manila in the Philippines. This study presents a holistic framework to assess SVF, based on susceptibility, exposure, and resilience factors while recognizing its multi-dimensional, multi-attribute, and context-dependent nature. The assessment was applied to three cities of Metro Manila: Marikina, Parañaque, and Manila. Indicators were systematically identified using deductive and hierarchical approaches, and factor indices were derived using a combined Simple Additive Weighting and Analytic Hierarchy Process, while the SVF index was estimated using the vulnerability relationship of the factors. The results exhibit a strong positive correlation with historical social flood damages and robustness across weight and normalization variations, with Marikina being the most vulnerable, followed by Parañaque and Manila. The city-level vulnerability profiles highlight salient determinants such as high population exposure in Parañaque, a relatively high population of susceptible social groups in Marikina, and significant disparity in flood control projects among the cities. Scenario analyses underscore the efficacy of flood countermeasures that reduce exposure and increase resilience. This study offers valuable insights and practical guidance for developing effective disaster reduction plans and policies in the study areas and similar regions by identifying disparities in vulnerability and understanding local conditions and drivers
Business · Computer security · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Flood myth · Flood risk management · Geography · Psychological resilience · Risk management · Social vulnerability · Water resource management · Climate change impacts on agriculture · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Psychology
Urban waterlogging disaster risk evaluation framework based on complex network and agent-based model
A state-of-the-art approach to assessing relative multi-dimensional vulnerabilities for urban flood resilience in the UK
Unfolding the Spatial Inequality of Neighborhood-Level Social Vulnerability to Flood Hazards During Urbanization in China
‘Sanay na Kami
The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used
What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Philippines
Stakeholder perceptions in flood risk assessment
Assessing social vulnerability to flood hazards
Multiscale GIS based-model to assess urban social vulnerability and associated risk
Social Vulnerability to Disasters
Social vulnerability to floods
Using green infrastructure as a social equity approach to reduce flood risks and address climate change impacts
Assessment of flood adaptive capacity of urban areas in Thailand
Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards
How Valid Are Social Vulnerability Models
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |