Reimagining disaster risk assessment
The role of information equity in vulnerable communities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22028100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Manuela Farinosi (0000-0001-8404-3187, University of Udine, corresponding author), C Piccolo (0000-0002-2719-0014), Alessandro Meneghini (0009-0001-2775-9952, University of Udine) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 142 |
| Pages | 106245 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106245 |
| OpenAlex | W7163568926 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Disaster risk assessment has traditionally focused on fatalities, economic losses, and physical damage, offering only a partial understanding of how risk is produced and experienced across social groups. This study advances an equity-centered approach by centering informational equity (the distribution of timely, comprehensible, and actionable information) as a critical yet underexamined dimension of disaster vulnerability. Through a multi-method case study of the 2023 Mortegliano hailstorm in Italy, we examined how information circulated across three interconnected communicative arenas: mainstream media, institutional actors, and vulnerable groups. Analysis of 121 media articles revealed that only 39% referenced vulnerable groups, predominantly framing vulnerability in economic terms, while rendering other dimensions invisible. Examination of 160 institutional social media posts showed that only 6.25% addressed vulnerable populations, and 20 interviews with institutional actors confirmed the use of standardized communication and brought to light the universal vulnerability paradox . Interviews with 16 vulnerable individuals documented reliance on informal networks to compensate for institutional gaps, with socially isolated individuals experiencing acute informational exclusion. These findings demonstrate that informational inequities emerge from systematic misalignments across the risk communication ecosystem, creating cumulative disadvantages for vulnerable populations. By reframing disaster risk assessment as a communicative process, this study contributes to reconceptualizing risk beyond traditional metrics, positioning information circulation as constitutive of vulnerability and resilience. Practical implications include integrating communicative metrics into emergency planning, institutionalizing accessibility audits, and embedding participatory co-design mechanisms within risk governance structures
Citizen journalism · Cognitive reframing · Corporate governance · Disaster risk reduction · Mainstream · Risk management · Disaster Management and Resilience · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Risk Perception and Management
The social amplification of risk framework
Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses
Preparing multilingual disaster communication for the crises of tomorrow
The origin and diffusion of the social vulnerability index (SoVI)
Using a table-top exercise to identify communication-related vulnerability to disasters
Communication-related vulnerability to disasters
An investigation into risk governance processes to encourage behaviour change to reduce disaster risk
Disasters and communities
Social vulnerability triage
Civic Engagement From a Communication Infrastructure Perspective
Vulnerability to environmental hazards
Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam
Preparedness for Emergency Response
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Rethinking media and disasters in a global age
Unspeakable Offenses
Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards
Vulnerability
Educational hazards? The politics of disaster risk education in Rio de Janeiro
Metaphors Matter
From the Margins to the Mainstream? Disaster Research at the Crossroads
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |