Fire-smart solutions for sustainable wildfire risk prevention
Bottom-up initiatives meet top-down policies under EU green deal
Bibliographic Data
Fuel management for wildfire risk prevention generally lacks economic sustainability. In marginal areas of southern Europe, this limits fuel treatment programs from reaching the critical mass of required treated area to modify landscape flammability, the fire regime and its impacts. This study investigates key fuel management initiatives for wildfire risk prevention in southern EU countries. We compared local approaches through a bottom-up selection of 38 initiatives, which we analyzed systematically through a set of fire-smart criteria: sustainability, cost-benefit ratio, synergies and inter-sectoral cooperation, integration between strategic prevention planning and multiple land governance goals (e.g., rural development, biodiversity conservation, energy supply), innovation and knowledge transfer, and adaptive management. We summarized lessons learned from the most innovative initiatives, by identifying solutions and functional approaches for building sustainable fuel management at the landscape scale, under fire-smart management principles. These make synergistic use of private, public and European resources to activate value chains that valorize the products, by-products and services generated by fuel management activities and their positive externalities on ecosystem services. The multiple mechanisms include fire-marketing, Payment for Ecosystem Services schemes, specific taxes, or environmental compensatory measures. These mechanisms catalyze the interest of multiple stakeholders (economic actors, private owners, land and fire management agencies) improving the cost-efficiency of landscape fuel management. We contend that the EU Green Deal offers the political backing and framework (mainstreaming of EU strategies and funding opportunities) to enable the replication of documented fire-smart models and functional approaches to wildfire risk prevention
Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Externality · Risk management · Sustainability · Fire effects on ecosystems · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Landslides and related hazards · Finance
Bridging wine and forestry sectors to reduce wildfires
Wildfire preparedness
Adapting whilst recovering
ML-based fire cause prediction
Integrating cultural ecosystem services in wildfire risk assessment
Forest fire causes and prevention strategies in Portugal
Pathways for sustainable coexistence with wildfires
Media trends and public interest in wildfires in Tuscany, Italy
Long-term forestation-deforestation dynamics in a socioeconomic perspective
Rethinking wildfire management policy
With an eye on fire
Assessing the implementation of wildfire mitigation initiatives for the protection of villages in Portugal
The current policy focus shift from a sectoral to a territorial governance of wildfire reduction is aligned with forest owners’ preferences
Uplifting local ecological knowledge as part of adaptation pathways to wildfire risk reduction
Nature–society relations in disaster governance frameworks
Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution
Boosting the EU forest-based bioeconomy
Wildfire management in Mediterranean-type regions
Climate regulation ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation are enhanced differently by climate- and fire-smart landscape management
Towards a systemic approach to fire risk management
The bio-economy as an opportunity to tackle wildfires in Mediterranean forest ecosystems
Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services
Resilient landscapes to prevent catastrophic forest fires
Rural development funding and wildfire prevention
Wildfire mitigation and adaptation
Wildfires, forest management and landowners⿿ collective action
Fire, humans and landscape in the European Alpine region during the Holocene
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |