TAPping into homeowners’ decision making and emotions
A think-aloud experimental study of homeowner responses to flood buyouts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22029398 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Polina Dineva (NOAA Office for Coastal Management), Ancilla Inocencio (0009-0005-5957-2956, University of Delaware, corresponding author), Christina McGranaghan (0000-0002-8577-9038, University of Delaware), Kent D Messer (0000-0002-9458-5278, University of Delaware), Leah H Palm‐Forster (0000-0001-8191-0310, University of Delaware), Laura Paul (Economic Research Service), A R Siders (0000-0001-6788-8313, University of Delaware) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 140 |
| Pages | 106155 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106155 |
| OpenAlex | W7160192318 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
Voluntary home buyouts are a central but often contentious strategy for reducing flood risk. Coordination mechanisms have been shown to increase participation and improve buyout outcomes in laboratory settings, yet their real-world effectiveness remains uncertain. This study extends prior experimental work by pairing different buyout strategies with think-aloud protocols (TAPs) to capture the cognitive and emotional reasoning of homeowners facing simulated buyout offers. Among homeowners, acceptance rates increase from 51% under a baseline posted-price mechanism to 65% when coordination incentives are introduced. Verbal data reveal that homeowners’ decisions are shaped not only by financial incentives and place and community attachment, but also by moral reasoning and perceived social tension. Some participants describe accepting a buyout out of concern for neighbors, while others reject it due to ethical discomfort or emotional resistance to leaving their community. These findings highlight that incentive-based coordination can encourage participation in buyouts but may also trigger feelings of guilt. Misinterpretation of flood probabilities further complicates decision-making, underscoring the importance of risk communication. By integrating behavioral and verbal data, this study offers a more nuanced foundation for designing equitable, community-centered buyout programs aligned with climate adaptation goals
Flood myth · Tapping · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Housing Market and Economics
Social justice implications of US managed retreat buyout programs
Verbal reports as data.
The case for strategic and managed climate retreat
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Perceived risk and preferences of response and recovery actions of individuals living in a floodplain community
Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States
Floodplain Buyouts and Municipal Finance
Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States
Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat
Agglomeration bonus
Adding realism to the Agglomeration Bonus
Home buyouts and household recovery
Should I stay or should I go? Factors in household decisions for or against relocation from a flood risk area
A verbal protocol analysis of choice under ambiguity
Rebuild or Relocate? Resilience and Postdisaster Decision‐Making After Hurricane Sandy
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods
Repetitive flood victims and acceptance of Fema mitigation offers
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|