Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Wetland Classification, Attribute Accuracy, and Scale

Bibliographic Data

ID22032906
AuthorsKate Carlson (University of Colorado Boulder), Barbara Buttenfield (0000-0001-5961-5809, University of Colorado Boulder, corresponding author), Yi Qiang (0000-0002-6872-8837, University of South Florida)
Year2024
Volume13
Issue3
Pages103
Publication date2024-03-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2220-9964 • E-ISSN: 2220-9964
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/ijgi13030103
OpenAlexW4393003554
LanguageEN
References cited18

Quantification of all types of uncertainty helps to establish reliability in any analysis. This research focuses on uncertainty in two attribute levels of wetland classification and creates visualization tools to guide analysis of spatial uncertainty patterns over several scales. A novel variant of confusion matrix analysis compares the Cowardin and Hydrogeomorphic wetland classification systems, identifying areas and types of misclassification for binary and multivariate categories. The specific focus on uncertainty in the paper refers to categorical consistency, that is, agreement between the two classification systems, rather than comparing observed data to ground truth. Consistency is quantified using confusion matrix analysis. Aggregation across progressive focal windows transforms the confusion matrix into a multiscale data pyramid for quick determination of where attribute uncertainty is highly variant, and at what spatial resolutions classification inconsistencies emerge. The focal pyramids summarize precision, recall, and F1 scores to visualize classification differences across spatial scales. Findings show that the F1 scores appear most informative on agreement about wetlands misclassification at both coarse and fine attribute scales. The pyramid organizes multi-scale uncertainty in a single unified framework and can be “sliced” to view individual focal levels of attribute consistency. Results demonstrate how the confusion matrix can be used to quantify the percentage of a study area in which inconsistencies occur reflecting wetland presence and type. The research provides confusion metrics and display tools to focus attention on specific areas of large data sets where attribute uncertainty patterns may be complex, thus reducing land managers’ workloads by highlighting areas of uncertainty where field checking might be appropriate, and improving analytics by providing visualization tools to quickly see where such areas occur

Biology · Cartography · Data mining · Geography · Remote sensing · Wetland · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Soil and Land Suitability Analysis · Artificial Intelligence · Ecology

  • Projecting Global Datasets to Achieve Equal Areas

    E Lynn Usery, Michael P Finn et al.•Cartography and Geographic…•2003

  • Thematic Cartography and Geovisualization

    Terry A Slocum, Robert Mcmaster et al.•Thematic Cartography and…•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae