Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Aerial Bombing Crater Identification

Exploitation of Precise Digital Terrain Models

Bibliographic Data

ID22033470
AuthorsMartin Dolejš (0000-0002-7821-897X, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, corresponding author), Jan Pacina (0000-0002-7241-0274, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem), Martin Veselý (0000-0002-3147-4941, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem), Dominik Brétt (0000-0001-8045-4237, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem)
Year2020
Volume9
Issue12
Pages713
Publication date2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2220-9964 • E-ISSN: 2220-9964
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/ijgi9120713
OpenAlexW3106605108
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited29

Places of past conflicts and persistent objects that reflect such events often attract the attention of archaeological prospection which facilitates the construction of conflict narratives. Field prospection as a precise method for localization of aerial bombing craters (as an example of such persistent features) is a highly time- and resource-consuming task. Therefore, methods for automatic identification of such features are evolving. We present a comparison of three methods for possible automatic crater detection based on (a) extraterrestrial crater detection algorithms, (b) geomorphology-based edge extraction, and (c) image pattern recognition via a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN). All methods were preliminarily tested on a case study of eight Second World War (WWII) aerial bombing crater sites in NW Czechia via Airborne Laser Scanned LiDAR-derived digital terrain models with different spatial resolutions. We found that extraterrestrial crater detection algorithms and geomorphology-based edge extraction methods yield worse results given the standard indices of precision and recall. By comparison, the CNN method utilized for a particular task achieved satisfying results, predominantly with 0.5 m/px resolution (which is often available at the country level) of the input raster. Nevertheless, overall performance with this resolution varies significantly among the sites. Therefore, the quality and readability of the input data are crucial factors for the successful acquisition of precise ordinance location identification

Cartography · Computer vision · Digital elevation model · Geography · Impact crater · Orthophoto · Remote sensing · Terrain · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Artificial Intelligence · Geology

  • A GIS-based multi-criteria geospatial workflow for mapping the hazard, exposure and risk of explosive remnants of war in twentieth-century conflict landscapes

    Open Access•Aldino Bondesan, Maria Petriccione et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2026

  • The Archaeology of Unexploded World War II Bomb Sites in the Koźle Basin, Southern Poland

    Open Access•Jan Maciej Waga, Bartłomiej Szypuła et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Prospecting of Architectural Features Using LiDAR‐UAV Technology, Deep Neural Networks and Visualization Techniques

    Open Access•Jhon A Zabaleta‐Santisteban, Jhon A Zabaleta-Santisteban et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2026

  • Automated large‐scale mapping and analysis of relict charcoal hearths in Connecticut (USA) using a Deep Learning Yolov4 framework

    Open Access•Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart, Alexander Bonhage et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2022

  • A multi‐temporal satellite‐based risk analysis of archaeological sites in Qazvin plain (Iran)

    Open Access•Federico Zaina, Yasaman Nabati Mazloumi•Archaeological Prospection•2021

  • Evaluating Mask R‐CNN models to extract terracing across oceanic high islands

    Open Access•Quintu, Deborah S Davis et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2023

  • Deep learning reveals extent of Archaic Native American shell-ring building practices

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis, Gino Caspari et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2021

  • Moated site object detection using time series satellite imagery and an improved deep learning model in northeast Thailand

    Open Access•Hong Yang, Shaohua Wang et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2024

  • Dynamics of Sediments in Reservoir Inflows

    Open Access•Jan Pacina, Zuzana Lenďáková et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2020

  • Detecting World War II bombing relics in markedly transformed landscapes (city of Most, Czechia)

    Open Access•Martin Dolejš, Vojtěch Samek Vojtěch Samek et al.•Applied Geography•2020

  • Learning to Look at LiDAR

    Open Access•Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart, Karsten Lambers•Journal of Computer Applications…•2019

  • Object‐based image analysis

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis•Archaeological Prospection•2019

  • The application of LiDAR-based DEMs on WWII conflict sites in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Max Van Der Schriek, Willem Frans Beex•Journal of Conflict Archaeology•2017

  • Using deep neural networks on airborne laser scanning data

    Open Access•Øivind Due Trier, Dave Cowley et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • Object‐based Shell Craters Classification from LiDAR‐derived Sky‐view Factor

    Open Access•Luigi Magnini, Cinzia Bettineschi et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2016

  • A witness in the landscape

    Open Access•David Capps Tunwell, David G Passmore et al.•War in History•2017

  • Convolutional neural networks for archaeological site detection – Finding “princely” tombs

    Open Access•Gino Caspari, Pablo Crespo•Journal of Archaeological Science•2019

  • Second World War bomb craters and the archaeology of Allied air attacks in the forests of the Normandie-Maine National Park, NW France

    David Capps Tunwell, David G Passmore et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2016

  • Second World War conflict archaeology in the forests of north-west Europe

    Open Access•David G Passmore, Stephan Harrison et al.•Antiquity•2014

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae