Evaluating Geovisualizations Based on Open Data
An Integrative Framework for Engagement, Openness, and Accessibility
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22033871 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrea Miletić (0000-0002-3324-201X, University of Zagreb), Ana Kuveždić Divjak (0000-0003-1059-8395, University of Zagreb) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 259 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2220-9964 • E-ISSN: 2220-9964 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijgi15060259 |
| OpenAlex | W7164170722 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
Geovisualizations based on open data are increasingly used as public-facing interfaces for communicating geospatial information, yet their evaluation often remains limited to isolated design, usability, or technical aspects. This study addresses that gap by developing and applying an integrative evaluation framework that combines four analytical dimensions: cartographic representation, interaction and engagement affordances, openness, and accessibility, while treating contextual characteristics as conditioning factors. The framework is operationalized through a mixed-methods content analysis of 26 publicly available geovisualizations based on open data. The results show that most cases are produced by public-sector actors, focus on environmental and transport themes, and rely on conventional cartographic techniques combined with medium levels of interactivity that support structured exploration rather than deeper analytical reasoning. Although many geovisualizations cite data sources and provide some form of data access, licensing remains inconsistent, particularly for the visualization artefacts themselves, limiting reuse potential. Accessibility is implemented even less consistently across geovisualizations, with recurring shortcomings in color contrast, keyboard navigation, screen-reader compatibility, and multilingual support. Overall, the findings suggest that the broader societal potential of geovisualizations based on open data may not be determined by individual features, but by balanced cross-dimensional configurations. Strengthening the integration of openness and accessibility alongside interaction and design may enhance the potential of geovisualizations to support reuse, inclusiveness, and public engagement
Data visualization · Geospatial analysis · Interactivity · Limiting · Openness to experience · Operationalization · Reuse · Visualization · Data Visualization and Analytics · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Spatial Cognition and Navigation
ColorBrewer.org
Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government
Debating big data
Geospatial Open Data Usage and Metadata Quality
A systematic review of open government data initiatives
Enhancing the usability and usefulness of open government data
Cognitive and Usability Issues in Geovisualization
Representation and its Relationship with Cartographic Visualization
Cartographic content analysis of compelling climate change communication
Interactivity Types in Geographic Visualization
The influence of the PSI directive on open government data
Open data policies, their implementation and impact
Open data visualizations and analytics as tools for policy-making
Open data innovation
Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives
Evaluation of Methods for Classifying Epidemiological Data on Choropleth Maps in Series
Cognitively Inspired and Perceptually Salient Graphic Displays for Efficient Spatial Inference Making
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |