Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning–Kriging Integrative Approaches for Enhanced Spatial Prediction of Mineral Exploration Data

Bibliographic Data

ID22034072
AuthorsHosang Han (0000-0002-9254-7243, Kangwon National University), Jangwon Suh (0000-0002-5724-428X, Kangwon National University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume15
Issue4
Pages175
Publication date2026-04-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2220-9964 • E-ISSN: 2220-9964
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/ijgi15040175
OpenAlexW7154503024
LanguageEN
References cited23

Accurate prediction of mineral concentrations from sparse exploration data is important for resource estimation. This study evaluates hybrid prediction models combining machine learning (ML) and geostatistics to predict aluminum (Al) concentrations. Twelve hybrid configurations were generated by combining six ML backbones—Random Forest, XGBoost, AdaBoost, ResNet, U-Net, and Spatial Transformer Network—with Ordinary Kriging (OK) and Universal Kriging (UK). Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold spatial cross-validation (CV) to reduce spatial leakage, and hyperparameters were tuned by grid-search CV within the training folds. For the hybrid models, residual kriging was fitted using cross-fitted out-of-fold residuals to reduce optimistic bias and prevent information leakage. The results showed no consistent performance separation between OK and UK variants. More importantly, the effect of integration was backbone dependent rather than uniformly beneficial. RF-based predictions showed the strongest overall out-of-sample performance, whereas hybrid gains for other backbones were generally modest. After multiple-comparison correction, most differences between standalone and hybrid models were not statistically significant. These findings indicate that increasing model complexity through hybridization does not guarantee improved accuracy and highlight the importance of spatially explicit, bias-aware evaluation when selecting prediction strategies for mineral resource exploration

Geostatistics · Hyperparameter · Kriging · Mineral exploration · Residual · Spatial analysis · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping

  • Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation

    Pierre Goovaerts•Geostatistics for natural…•1997

  • Another look at measures of forecast accuracy

    Open Access•Rob J Hyndman, Anne B Koehler•International Journal of…•2006

  • U-Net

    Open Access•Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer et al.•Medical Image Computing and…•2015

  • A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting

    Open Access•Yoav Freund, Robert E Schapire•Journal of Computer and System…•1997

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae