The Problem of the Origin of Religion in the Mirror of Psychology
From Classics to Contemporaries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22035188 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Valentyna Pavlenko (0000-0003-4947-3995, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 40-54 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Psychology and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2221-1527 • E-ISSN: 2311-7052 |
| Publisher | Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.17759/sps.2022130204 |
| OpenAlex | W4285199754 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Objective. To present the classical points of view on the problem of the origin of religion and give an overview of modern views. Acquaintance with the described approaches will make it possible to better represent the current state of this problem and develop the own position on the basis of the directions developed in domestic psychology. Background. The problem of the origin of religion — the important socio-psychological phenomenon — was not in the focus of attention of domestic psychologists, therefore, with rare exceptions, the approaches to its solution proposed abroad were not highlighted in the scientific literature. In the spring of 2020, the international journal “Archive of Psychology of Religion” prepared a special issue dealing with the stated problem. It was another proof of the interest of foreign scientists in this topic and demonstrated the main approaches that have been formed to date on this issue. Methodology. Descriptive and comparative analysis methods. Conclusions. It is shown that at the present stage the main opposition on the problem of the origin of religion is observed between the supporters of the cognitive direction, who consider the emergence of religion exclusively as a result of the work of cognitive processes, as an accidental by-product of evolution, and supporters of cultural evolutionists, who consider religion a useful adaptation in the process of evolution. The examples of the works of the leading representatives of these areas demonstrate the most characteristic features of these approaches and the main discussion points. In this article we also discussed the work of researches who were trying to build a bridge between these opposing points of view and bring them closer together
Begging · Cognition · Epistemology · Evolutionism · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Cultural Differences and Values · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Law · Philosophy · Psychedelics and Drug Studies · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|