Paradoxes of Kindness in the Context of Prosocial Behavior
Analysis of Modern Concepts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22035290 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E V Ryaguzova (0000-0003-2079-690X, Saratov State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-21 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Psychology and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2221-1527 • E-ISSN: 2311-7052 |
| Publisher | Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.17759/sps.2024150101 |
| OpenAlex | W4394687331 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 24 |
Objective. Analysis of the modern concepts of kindness as a moral and ethical construct and a predictor of prosocial human behavior, to identify paradoxes of kindness, indicating the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of the content of kindness, the ambivalence of the consequences of manifestation and the ambiguity of interpretation by the subjects of interaction. Background. In the modern information technology world, the problem of preserving the human in man and his moral cultural code is clearly identified, which is clearly intensifying in an era of uncertainty, instability and global risks. Kindness as a virtue and value, a personal quality and one of the predictors of prosocial behavior, having an interdisciplinary status, is studied in sufficient detail by various researchers, but not all of their results are presented in the domestic literature, and therefore their consolidation and clarification of the “kindness” construct in within the framework of social psychology. Conclusions. Main conclusions. The concept of “kindness” is clarified as an ethical construct of the individual and a predictor of prosocial behavior, as well as a social norm that regulates interpersonal interactions, strengthens trust and ensures social connections. “Paradoxes” of kindness have been identified, containing multidirectional psychological orientations – care for the Other and care for oneself, ambivalent consequences of showing kindness and its ambiguous interpretation by the subjects of interaction. The prospects for empirical research aimed at studying subjective ideas about kindness, diagnosing its modes, and identifying socio-psychological mediators and moderators are identified
Biology · Kindness · Prosocial behavior · Theology · Cultural Differences and Values · Educational Methods and Teacher Development · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Development and Education · Social Psychology
Prosocial behavior and altruism
Development of a measure of kindness
Unconditional Kindness to Strangers
Prevalence of compassion fatigue among helping professions and relationship to compassion for others, self‐compassion and self‐criticism
Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor
The Role of Social Support, Being Present, and Self‐kindness in University Student Psychological Distress
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods
Self-Compassion
| Highly cited | No |
|---|